Here is my newest IELTS essay on the topic of animals! Specifically, if humans should protect all wild animals or just some specific ones.
Be sure to check out my Ebooks here.
Check out a related video here too: https://youtube.com/shorts/R-7vLPqjfis?si=li058QWVhLHUJEfG
Dave
IELTS Essay: Animals
Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals, while others think that it is important to protect some, not all of them.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some have suggested that protection of wild animals should be selective. In my opinion, humanity has responsibility for all wild animals, though it is occasionally justified to divert resources towards more valuable species.
Those in favor of safeguarding certain wild animals argue the circumstantial factors. These factors can range from the threat the specific animals face to the value of the animal itself. For instance, tigers are an endangered wild animal and require intensive conservation efforts compared with animals such as rats and pigeons, which have adapted skillfully to urban environments. Most would admit that there is little logic in providing equal support to species in different circumstances. A more extreme critic could add that some animals are more deserving of preservation. The tiger, to continue the previous example, is greatly valued for its elegance. Other animals, such as bees, are valuable not for their beauty but their usefulness to humanity.
However, all animals should be protected as humanity has been the catalyst for their endangerment. Before the rapid industrialization and surging populations of the last several hundred years, humans and animals lived on relatively equal terms and shared the Earth. Since human development has outpaced nature and now threatens the habitats of countless species, it is a duty for mankind to enact safeguards for all animals. Without such forward-looking protections, there is likely to be a “domino effect” as species die out and impair fragile ecosystems globally. Therefore even if an animal is not on the verge of extinction, it might be important to maintain their population levels so as to not start a cycle of irreversible harms.
In conclusion, humans should endeavor to protect as many animals as possible although there are exceptional cases where some species may be prioritized. Governments and individuals should collaborate to ensure wild animals are not unduly threatened by human progress.
Analysis
1. Some have suggested that protection of wild animals should be selective. 2. In my opinion, humanity has responsibility for all wild animals, though it is occasionally justified to divert resources towards more valuable species.
- Paraphrase the overall essay topic.
- Write a clear opinion. Read more about introductions here.
1. Those in favor of safeguarding certain wild animals argue the circumstantial factors. 2. These factors can range from the threat the specific animals face to the value of the animal itself. 3. For instance, tigers are an endangered wild animal and require intensive conservation efforts compared with animals such as rats and pigeons, which have adapted skillfully to urban environments. 4. Most would admit that there is little logic in providing equal support to species in different circumstances. 5. A more extreme critic could add that some animals are more deserving of preservation. 6. The tiger, to continue the previous example, is greatly valued for its elegance. 7. Other animals, such as bees, are valuable not for their beauty but their usefulness to humanity.
- Write a topic sentence with a clear main idea at the end.
- Explain your main idea.
- Develop it with specific or hypothetical examples.
- Keep developing it fully.
- Add more deatil.
- Include some long and complex sentences.
- Finish the paragraph strong.
1. However, all animals should be protected as humanity has been the catalyst for their endangerment. 2. Before the rapid industrialization and surging populations of the last several hundred years, humans and animals lived on relatively equal terms and shared the Earth. 3. Since human development has outpaced nature and now threatens the habitats of countless species, it is a duty for mankind to enact safeguards for all animals. 4. Without such forward-looking protections, there is likely to be a “domino effect” as species die out and impair fragile ecosystems globally. 5. Therefore even if an animal is not on the verge of extinction, it might be important to maintain their population levels so as to not start a cycle of irreversible harms.
- Write a new topic sentence with a new main idea at the end.
- Explain your new main idea.
- Include specific details and examples.
- Add as much information as you can and make sure it links logically.
- Develop the example fully.
1. In conclusion, humans should endeavor to protect as many animals as possible although there are exceptional cases where some species may be prioritized. 2. Governments and individuals should collaborate to ensure wild animals are not unduly threatened by human progress.
- Summarise your main ideas.
- Include a final thought. Read more about conclusions here.
Vocabulary
What do the words in bold below mean? Make some notes on paper to aid memory and then check below.
Some have suggested that protection of wild animals should be selective. In my opinion, humanity has responsibility for all wild animals, though it is occasionally justified to divert resources towards more valuable species.
Those in favor of safeguarding certain wild animals argue the circumstantial factors. These factors can range from the threat the specific animals face to the value of the animal itself. For instance, tigers are an endangered wild animal and require intensive conservation efforts compared with animals such as rats and pigeons, which have adapted skillfully to urban environments. Most would admit that there is little logic in providing equal support to species in different circumstances. A more extreme critic could add that some animals are more deserving of preservation. The tiger, to continue the previous example, is greatly valued for its elegance. Other animals, such as bees, are valuable not for their beauty but their usefulness to humanity.
However, all animals should be protected as humanity has been the catalyst for their endangerment. Before the rapid industrialization and surging populations of the last several hundred years, humans and animals lived on relatively equal terms and shared the Earth. Since human development has outpaced nature and now threatens the habitats of countless species, it is a duty for mankind to enact safeguards for all animals. Without such forward-looking protections, there is likely to be a “domino effect” as species die out and impair fragile ecosystems globally. Therefore even if an animal is not on the verge of extinction, it might be important to maintain their population levels so as to not start a cycle of irreversible harms.
In conclusion, humans should endeavor to protect as many animals as possible although there are exceptional cases where some species may be prioritized. Governments and individuals should collaborate to ensure wild animals are not unduly threatened by human progress.
Answers
For extra practice, write an antonym (opposite word) on a piece of paper to help you remember the new vocabulary:
suggested advised
protection keeping safe
selective chosen
humanity mankind
responsibility duty
occasionally justified sometimes supported
divert resources towards sent in another direction at
valuable species important kind of animal
those in favor of people who support
safeguarding keeping safe
certain definite
argue point out
circumstantial factors contextual elements
range from include
threat risk
For instance for example
endangered near extinction
require intensive conservation efforts need lots of help
compared with relative to
adapted skillfully changed masterfully
urban environments cities
Most would admit that many would concede
little logic not much reason
providing equal support giving the same amount of help
different circumstances changing situations
extreme critic people strongly against
deserving should get
preservation staying alive and protected
previous example instance mentioned before
greatly valued considered important
usefulness utility
catalyst spark, cause
endangerment putting in danger
rapid industrialization becoming more and more developed
surging populations more and more people
last several hundred years since the 1800s or so
lived on continue to be alive
relatively equal terms almost living like equals
shared both using it
outpaced got a lot faster than
habitats places where animals live
countless limitless
duty responsibility
enact safeguards create protection
forward-looking protections progressive safeguards
“domino effect” will cause ramifications
die out go extinct
impair fragile ecosystems hurt a chain of animals
globally all around the world
not on the verge of extinction not about to die out completely
maintain keep the same
population levels how many are alive
cycle chain
irreversible harms can’t be fixed
endeavor try hard
exceptional cases extreme examples
prioritized considered most important
collaborate work together
ensure make sure
unduly unjustifiably
human progress mankind advancing
Pronunciation
Practice saying the vocabulary below and use this tip about Google voice search:
səˈʤɛstɪd
prəˈtɛkʃən
sɪˈlɛktɪv
hju(ː)ˈmænɪti
rɪsˌpɒnsəˈbɪlɪti
əˈkeɪʒnəli ˈʤʌstɪfaɪd
daɪˈvɜːt rɪˈsɔːsɪz təˈwɔːdz
ˈvæljʊəbl ˈspiːʃiːz
ðəʊz ɪn ˈfeɪvər ɒv
ˈseɪfgɑːdɪŋ
ˈsɜːtn
ˈɑːgjuː
ˌsɜːkəmˈstænʃəl ˈfæktəz
reɪnʤ frɒm
θrɛt
fɔːr ˈɪnstəns
ɪnˈdeɪnʤəd
rɪˈkwaɪər ɪnˈtɛnsɪv ˌkɒnsə(ː)ˈveɪʃən ˈɛfəts
kəmˈpeəd wɪð
əˈdæptɪd ˈskɪlf(ə)li
ˈɜːbən ɪnˈvaɪərənmənts
məʊst wʊd ədˈmɪt ðæt
ˈlɪtl ˈlɒʤɪk
prəˈvaɪdɪŋ ˈiːkwəl səˈpɔːt
ˈdɪfrənt ˈsɜːkəmstənsɪz
ɪksˈtriːm ˈkrɪtɪk
dɪˈzɜːvɪŋ
ˌprɛzə(ː)ˈveɪʃən
ˈpriːviəs ɪgˈzɑːmpl,
ˈgreɪtli ˈvæljuːd
ˈjuːsfʊlnəs
ˈkætəlɪst
ɪnˈdeɪnʤəmənt
ˈræpɪd ɪnˌdʌstrɪəlaɪˈzeɪʃən
ˈsɜːʤɪŋ ˌpɒpjʊˈleɪʃənz
lɑːst ˈsɛvrəl ˈhʌndrəd jɪəz
lɪvd ɒn
ˈrɛlətɪvli ˈiːkwəl tɜːmz
ʃeəd
aʊtˈpeɪst
ˈhæbɪtæts
ˈkaʊntlɪs
ˈdjuːti
ɪˈnækt ˈseɪfgɑːdz
ˈfɔːwədˈlʊkɪŋ prəˈtɛkʃənz
“ˈdɒmɪnəʊ ɪˈfɛkt“
daɪ aʊt
ɪmˈpeə ˈfræʤaɪl ˈiːkəʊˌsɪstəmz
ˈgləʊbəli
nɒt ɒn ðə vɜːʤ ɒv ɪksˈtɪŋkʃən
meɪnˈteɪn
ˌpɒpjʊˈleɪʃən ˈlɛvlz
ˈsaɪkl
ˌɪrɪˈvɜːsəbl hɑːmz
ɪnˈdɛvə
ɪkˈsɛpʃənl ˈkeɪsɪz
praɪˈɒrɪˌtaɪzd
kəˈlæbəreɪt
ɪnˈʃʊə
ʌnˈdjuːli
ˈhjuːmən ˈprəʊgrəs
Vocabulary Practice
Some have s____________d that p______________n of wild animals should be s_______________e. In my opinion, h_______________y has r__________________y for all wild animals, though it is o______________________d to d______________________s more v___________________s.
T________________________________________________n wild animals a_______e the c___________________________s. These factors can r_____________m the t_________t the specific animals face to the value of the animal itself. F______________e, tigers are an e______________d wild animal and r_________________________________s c_____________________h animals such as rats and pigeons, which have a_____________________y to u____________________s. M_____________________t there is l_________________c in p_______________________t to species in d___________________________s. A more e__________________c could add that some animals are more d______________g of p_______________n. The tiger, to continue the p___________________e, is g__________________d for its elegance. Other animals, such as bees, are valuable not for their beauty but their u______________s to humanity.
However, all animals should be protected as humanity has been the c_________t for their e________________t. Before the r_______________________________n and s______________________s of the l________________________________s, humans and animals l______________________________s and s_______d the Earth. Since human development has o___________d nature and now threatens the h_________s of c__________s species, it is a d____y for mankind to e______________s for all animals. Without such f_______________________s, there is likely to be a “d_______________t” as species die out and i___________________________y. Therefore even if an animal is n____________________________n, it might be important to m__________n their p___________________s so as to not start a c________e of i__________________s.
In conclusion, humans should e______________r to protect as many animals as possible although there are e_______________s where some species may be p________________d. Governments and individuals should c________________e to e________e wild animals are not u__________y threatened by h________________s.
Listening Practice
Speaking Practice
Animals
- What was your favorite animal as a child?
- Do people in your country keep pets?
- What kind of pet would you not like to have?
- Is environmental protection important?
Writing Practice
It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening.
Do you agree or disagree?
Sir, can we use the phrase a ‘postcode lottery’ in writing T2 to explain the disparity of public services in different areas.
I’m not familiar with that term… – if you explain it and use quotes that would be fine!
Thanks, Sir. I saw this term in a few BBC news articles.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-41346237
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-59211183
I think, to be on the safe side, I’d rather not use it.
Every year a significant number of wild creatures are in danger of extinction. For that some individuals argue that all wild animals should be saved while others believe that only certain animals should be preserved. In this essay I will be discussing both views and why in my opinion all animals live matter.
To begin with , people who are in favour of the opinion that only some types of animals should be saved argue that there are some animals that are dangerous predators and their existence are a threat to human kind. Moreover , it will take a lot of money to conserve and save them and they believe this money could be invested in other areas such as education or infrastructure.
On the other hand, the predominant reason why we should protect animals is to maintain a healthy ecosystem. Moreover , some wild animals could be used for medicinal purposes. For instance, snake venom is used as a medical tool. Furthermore , because of human habitation and overuse of natural resources those creatures are in danger of extinction so at least we could make some effort to conserve them all without any exception.
In conclusion, we should save all wild animals that are still present in the world , selecting some of them is an idea why we should discard since it will bring more devastating outcomes.
Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals, while others think that it is important to protect some, not all of them.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
Safeguarding wild lives is a topical issue globally. While it is considered by some that all wild animals should be taken care of, other believed that a selected few should benefit from this arrangement. In this essay I will discuss both views and make a conclusion.
One the one hand, the proponent of an holistic animal preservation believed that all wild animals are facing enormous dangers in the woods . For instance many beasts are devastated by green house effects thus dying at a tender age therefore they need to be nurtured to prevent them from extinction The resultant effect of this will foster ecosystem diversification and balance
Additionally, keeping all wild lives will be a welcome development for the advocates of animal right. It is a common view that no animal is more important than another so if the wild lives will benefit from human intervention, it has to be all encompassing.
On the other hand, however, the critics of the above opinion believed that it is not financially sustainable. They argue that money meant for other essential services such as civil service, infrastructural development and human development will be channelled into building parks, zoos, provision of food and drugs to tend animals at the expense of man.
Furthermore, overpopulation of games in manmade habitats can bring a handful of issues. Animal becomes more aggressive posing danger to their carers and in the extreme of cases escapes and cause serious threats to mankind. An Australian magazine reported of a family of five who was killed by a lion that escaped zoos. This kind of disaster won’t have happened if wild animal that can’t be tamed easily is left in the forest.
To conclude, all wild animals deserve some protection but this should be limited to selected few in order to limit harm to the people and prevent economic catastrophe.