3.4K - 3.4KShares
Your IELTS conclusion is on a mission should you choose to accept it.
There are 3 simple objectives on this mission:
1. State your opinion/position
2. Give your main reason for this opinion
3. Add an extra detail
Let’s look at these objectives more closely below.
If you want to read more about conclusions, I recommend checking out some of my sample answers here.
If you want to both improve your English and feel comfortable, I now offer online lessons complete with feedback, videos, workbooks and more – you can learn more here!
Don’t miss out on my new Patreon exclusive essays here and my IELTS writing marking service here.
Dave
1. State your opinion/position
This is the main mission for your conclusion. If you only accomplish one objective, it should be this one.
The reason for it is in the band descriptors:
The key here is ‘presents a relevant position’. A position is the same thing as an opinion.
If you don’t say your opinion it is impossible to get a band 6 or above. Mission not accomplished.
Put in your conclusion and you can get at least a 6. So – just do it!
For example, ‘In my opinion, smoking should be banned in public places’ or ‘I believe that all children should be required to take computer lessons in school.’
Here is some vocabulary that will make your position crystal clear:
Be careful – only use the ones in blue and red for writing. The pink ones are only for the speaking test.
(By the way, if you want more tips like this you can check out our Facebook group)
2. Give your Main Reason for this Opinion
This one is pretty simple – just say why you have that opinion!
Don’t make up a new reason – use one that you already talked about in your writing.
For example: ‘In my opinion, smoking should be banned in public places because it has harmful side effects for people who are not smoking‘ or ‘I believe that all children should be required to take computer lessons in school because it will have a positive impact on their ability to get a good job later in life.’
3. An Extra Detail
This one is a little controversial.
Normally, examiners mark everyone’s writing exactly the same.
It doesn’t matter if you are in Bangladesh or France or Japan or Antarctica – you get the same marks because every examiner follows the band descriptors, like a perfectly objective robot.
But there are a few small areas where examiners do mark things a little differently. This is related to how long they have been marking, some unclear areas in the band descriptors, the person who trained them and even just human nature.
In these areas of difference you should always choose the safe option.
The safe option here is to include an extra detail to finish off your essay because some examiners will require you to have this for Band 7+.
What is an extra detail?
It could be a solution, more support for your opinion, a prediction – anything really!
Here are a few examples of extra details:
Prediction: If we ban smoking, people will lead longer, more productive lives and less money will be wasted on healthcare.
Further support: Health is more important than anything else and any effort to improve people’s health, including banning smoking, is a positive step forward.
Solution: The best way for nations to begin to institute these bans is to first raise taxes which will result in fewer smokers overall before completely banning smoking sometime in the next 20 years.
You do not need all 3 of those. 1 or 2 sentences with extra detail is enough to make sure you don’t get bumped down to band 6 because of a malfunctioning robot!
Here is a checklist from our Instagram page:
A Complete Conclusion
‘In my opinion, smoking should be banned in public places because it has harmful side effects for people who are not smoking. Health is more important than anything else and any effort to improve people’s health, including banning smoking, is a positive step forward.’
Opinion + Main Reason Why + Extra Detail = Mission Accomplished!
Now it’s Your Turn! Comment below!
Write only the conclusion for the following topic in the comments below:
Some people believe that we should have complete free speech and be allowed to say anything we want. Others think that there should be some limits on free speech. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
If you need some more information about conclusions check out this post.
Don‘t miss your chance to learn the facts about IELTS and improve your English with my online courses, guaranteed!
3.4K - 3.4KShares
Really it is useful in fact I made use of this processes thanks a lot again and again
Glad you found it useful! Thanks for the feedback.
I believe there ought to be certain boundaries to expression of opinions as otherwise it can lead to conflicts. Avoidong conflicts will lead to harmony and yield progress.
Well written!
Some corrections:
the expression, this can lead to
This is very much useful. Thanks for assisting and guiding IELTS students.
You’re welcome!
In conclusion, I am certain that people should screen their words to avoid hurt feelings and be more effective in communication. If every individual is mindful of what they say and be responsible for their speech, the society will become more inclusive and welcoming.
Awesome conclusion – jealous of it!
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that some restrictions ought to be imposed on free speech so that it does not violate social and cultural values or create a negative impact on the society. Government in consultation with active cultural groups should issue a broad framework and regulate the society.
Great work KS!
We just say regulate society – no ‘the’
What score are you aiming for?
In my opinion, free speech should not be restricted by anything because it is the basic right of any person. It is when people are banned from expressing their thoughts openly, many dictatorship regimes gain more power and can easily manipulate people.
Awesome conclusion, Viktor!
Personally, I believe both arguments make valid points, as anything can become damaging in excess, be it maintaining silence when a crime is committed or using free speech to manipulate the public, we must hold critical thinking at all times when it comes to this topic.
Hmmm, careful Lena, when you sit in the middle like that you risk a band 4/5 for task achievement.
Safer to just choose an overall side.
In my opinion,there should be some limits and prohibitions on free speech because saying what we think could sometimes lead to chaos and controversies whereas protecting the peace in society should always be the most important priority for governments.
Good! Make sure you include the first sentence as well, Amir!
I didn’t get it.What do you mean by including the first sentence?
Naleema Hettiarachchi Gamage
In my view, there should be certain limitations in allowing people to talk freely as it may have and harmful impact for the society which could lead to conflicts among social groups. Mindful speaking will not only benefit the society it will also exacerbate the feeling of unity among people
impressive conclusion