The conclusion should be the easiest part of your IELTS Writing Task 2 essay.
You’ve done all the hard work – you’ve come up with all the ideas, the structure, your body paragraphs – and now you just have to finish off the last paragraph.
It’s like a footballer who’s run the length of the football pitch and now they are facing an open goal. They just have to put the ball in the back of the net.
However, the conclusion is where a lot of IELTS students fail to score a goal. They make a simple mistake and get an automatic 5 for Task Achievement!
Read some full writing task 2 sample answers from the real test here.
Be sure to avoid the mistakes that most students make on writing by signing up for my exclusive IELTS Ebooks here on Patreon.
Dave
Review – What should a conclusion contain?
First let’s look at an example question:
Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like.
Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
A simple conclusion should include the following:
– A clear overall opinion or ‘position’
“In conclusion, I feel that there are clear advantages of allowing students to choose their own subjects.”
– A summary (paraphrase) of your main and supporting ideas
“The main benefits are students who are more motivated, successful and creative. This outweighs the drawback of a lack of students in core subjects.”
– A final thought (for bands 7+)
“The question reminds us that we must always make sure our Universities are flexible enough to meet the challenges that society will face in the future.”
But actually the most important is including your position/opinion, because without it you will get a 5 for Task Achievement.
This is the big mistake that holds back too many students from getting the score they deserve: no clear opinion/position.
Clear overall opinion or ‘position’
The first thing to remember is that for nearly all IELTS Task 2 questions you need to choose a side.
If you don’t choose a side and support that ‘position’ clearly, you will end up with a 5 for your Task Achievement.
Ideally, you should state your position in your introduction and confirm it in your conclusion.
But even if you don’t include it in your intro, it should definitely be clear in your conclusion.
So our example position is as follows:
“In conclusion, I feel that there are clear advantages of allowing students to choose their own subjects.”
Some students fail to do this and say “Both X and Y have advantages and disadvantages.”
That is not a clear conclusion, so you will definitely lose marks for your task response.
If you don’t have a clear opinion you can only get a maximum of 5 for task achievement, no matter how good the rest of your writing is!
Also, you shouldn’t say “Overall I think X and Y are important so we should allow both.”
Technically this is OK as your opinion is clear, but some examiners might not agree so this is risky.
Therefore if your position is to sit on the fence you might lose marks for your task response.
So the safest strategy is to choose a side, even if that isn’t your real opinion.
Summary of your main and supporting ideas
For this one, just re-state all of your main ideas from your two body paragraphs and the most relevant supporting ideas.
Position: students should be allowed to chose their own subjects
Main idea for first side (body 1): Students will be more motivated
Supporting ideas (body 1): they will work harder, achieve more and be more creative
Main idea for other side (body 2): A lack of students in core subjects
Supporting ideas (body 2): less skilled labour force, negative impact on economy.
Therefore your paraphrase of your main ideas is as follows:
“The main benefits are students who are more motivated, successful and creative. This outweighs the drawback of a lack of students in core subjects.”
Adding a final thought
Some IELTS examiners feel that to achieve a 7+ for task achievement you should have some new information in your conclusion.
This is one of the few, tricky areas where different examiners will give you different scores. Some don’t care about this. Others will not give you above a 7 for task achievement if you don’t have some new information in your conclusion!
One common way to add an extra comment is to draw out something about the general topic related to the future.
“The question reminds us that we must always make sure our Universities are flexible enough to meet the challenges that society will face in the future.”
Model conclusion
Here are all three elements together:
Clear position Summary of ideas New information
In conclusion, I feel that there are clear advantages of allowing students to choose their own subjects. The main benefits are students who are more motivated, successful and creative. This outweighs the drawback of a lack of students in core subjects. The question reminds us that we must always make sure our Universities are flexible enough to meet the challenges that society will face in the future.
Remember: the opinion/position is the most important part. Include that to make sure you get at least a 5 for task achievement.
Now it’s your turn! Put your answers in the comments
In some countries, governments are making some criminals do voluntary community work rather than being put in prison.
To what extent do you agree with this?
In conclusion, I completely disagree with the notion of allowing convicted to perform any sort of community work. Keeping in view the safety and wellbeing of the citizens, criminals must be kept and rehabilitated in isolation. It is hoped that while making policies regarding unlawful people, the safety of the nationals is given due importance.
Wonderful! Corrections: ‘In conclusion, I completely disagree with the PROPOSAL TO ALLOW convictS to perform any sort of community work. Keeping in view the safety and wellbeing of the citizens, criminals must be kept and rehabilitated in isolation. It is CLEAR that WHEN making policies regarding DANGEROUS CRIMINALS, the safety of the nationals SHOULD BE given ITS due importance.’
In conclusion, I definitely agree the criminals with minor crime to do voluntary services instead of being jailed. One could right the wrong if they’re given hope and being forgiven. In the future, it is worth for the government to look into different possibilities on how to help the criminals a new life.
Great conclusion! You followed my structure very clearly! Some corrections: agree criminals with minor crimes should do, One can right a wrong, and are forgiven, worthwhile, help criminals start a new life.
In conclusion, I feel that there are clear advantages of allowing criminals to participate in voluntary services. The main benefits are delinquents who are more productive and motivative. This outweighs the drawback of putting them in jail and making them so upset. Nations should allow wrongdoers to sustain their lives by learning the efficient skills and applying for jobs.
That’s good Helena!
If you are worried about timing you can save some time by writing just 2 or 3 sentences. The keys are that you repeat your opinion (as you did) and have a final thought/extra detail (which you also have). Keep working hard!
In conclusion, I strongly reaffirm my stance that culprits should work together and and strengthen the country with these works. Only if we work together towards a common goal will the established national system succeed. It is hoped for all that those crime-committers assist the development of the country and become an asset instead of a liability.
In conclusion, I utterly disagree with letting criminals take on community duties instead of imprisonment as it is a possible threat to the safety of normal citizens. A more preferable measure could be incorporating community duty and captive time-blocks, allowing prisoners to compensate for their wrong-doings and relieve the mental stress off of constant isolation.
From my perspective, I feel that voluntary community work can enhance an individual’s inner soul and could also reform his activities toward society. Prisons will definitely give them a realization of their wrongdoing, whereas social and community work will encourage them to have an optimistic approach to their lives. As directionless attitudes can be harmful to mankind, hence authorities should motivate offenders to work for society as well as learn to earn back their lost status.