This is an IELTS writing task 2 sample answer essay on the topic of whether or not math and philosophy should be compulsory/mandatory from the real IELTS exam.
It’s a really strange question, to be honest! Read below to see how I handled it….
Please consider supporting me on Patreon.com/howtodoielts to receive my exclusive IELTS Ebooks – you can even sign up for private live lessons with me!
Dave
IELTS Essay: Compulsory Math and Philosophy
Some people think that because children find subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult, they ought to be optional instead of compulsory.
To what extent do you agree?
Many feel that overly rigorous subjects such as mathematics and philosophy should not be mandatory for children. In my opinion, though there is a risk students will struggle to cope, teachers should be able to adapt the subject matter.
One reason these subjects should not be mandatory is they are often too abstract for young children. Numbers themselves are abstract. This is why many children are unable to tell time as it is essentially a metaphorical division of a circle into a clock. Teachers who place too much emphasis on abstract numbers and ideas in their lessons will find that students may become bored because they are unable to grasp the concepts. Philosophy could also become tedious and inefficient if the students lack the cognitive ability to apply general rules and ethical considerations to everyday life. This capacity to recognize and apply abstractions typically develops later in adolescence.
However, these subjects can be made accessible for children. The key is the approach of teachers and choice of materials. Math, for example, does not need to begin with complex, abstract equations but could instead involve real world scenarios and simple logic. Numbers could be introduced later as children tend to be confused by less grounded concepts. Similarly, philosophy can be approached from a number of mediums, including through stories. Many children’s stories and fables feature curious protagonists and interesting morals. Instead of explicitly instructing children through academic jargon, they can engage with the same questions about life and its origins more directly through the journey of characters in a story.
In conclusion, despite the risks of theory-heavy subjects for young learners, schools should embrace the challenge and seek less explicit teaching methodologies. This will help form the basis of a well-rounded education.
Analysis
1. Many feel that overly rigorous subjects such as mathematics and philosophy should not be mandatory for children. 2. In my opinion, though there is a risk students will struggle to cope, teachers should be able to adapt the subject matter.
- Paraphrase the overall essay topic.
- Write a clear opinion. Read more about introductions here.
1. One reason these subjects should not be mandatory is they are often too abstract for young children. 2. Numbers themselves are abstract. 3. This is why many children are unable to tell time as it is essentially a metaphorical division of a circle into a clock. 4. Teachers who place too much emphasis on abstract numbers and ideas in their lessons will find that students may become bored because they are unable to grasp the concepts. 5. Philosophy could also become tedious and inefficient if the students lack the cognitive ability to apply general rules and ethical considerations to everyday life. 6. This capacity to recognize and apply abstractions typically develops later in adolescence.
- Write a topic sentence with a clear main idea at the end.
- Explain your main idea.
- Develop it with specific or hypothetical examples.
- Keep developing it fully.
- Extend with some long sentences as well.
- Finish this main idea.
1. However, these subjects can be made accessible for children. 2. The key is the approach of teachers and choice of materials. 3. Math, for example, does not need to begin with complex, abstract equations but could instead involve real world scenarios and simple logic. 4. Numbers could be introduced later as children tend to be confused by less grounded concepts. 5. Similarly, philosophy can be approached from a number of mediums, including through stories. 6. Many children’s stories and fables feature curious protagonists and interesting morals. 7. Instead of explicitly instructing children through academic jargon, they can engage with the same questions about life and its origins more directly through the journey of characters in a story.
- Write a new topic sentence with a new main idea at the end.
- Explain your new main idea.
- Include specific details and examples.
- Continue developing it…
- as fully as possible!
- This paragraph can be long.
- Finish with a strong statement.
1. In conclusion, despite the risks of theory-heavy subjects for young learners, schools should embrace the challenge and seek less explicit teaching methodologies. 2. This will help form the basis of a well-rounded education.
- Summarise your main ideas.
- Include a final thought. Read more about conclusions here.
Vocabulary
What do the words in bold below mean? Make some notes on paper to aid memory and then check below.
Many feel that overly rigorous subjects such as mathematics and philosophy should not be mandatory for children. In my opinion, though there is a risk students will struggle to cope, teachers should be able to adapt the subject matter.
One reason these subjects should not be mandatory is they are often too abstract for young children. Numbers themselves are abstract. This is why many children are unable to tell time as it is essentially a metaphorical division of a circle into a clock. Teachers who place too much emphasis on abstract numbers and ideas in their lessons will find that students may become bored because they are unable to grasp the concepts. Philosophy could also become tedious and inefficient if the students lack the cognitive ability to apply general rules and ethical considerations to everyday life. This capacity to recognize and apply abstractions typically develops later in adolescence.
However, these subjects can be made accessible for children. The key is the approach of teachers and choice of materials. Math, for example, does not need to begin with complex, abstract equations but could instead involve real world scenarios and simple logic. Numbers could be introduced later as children tend to be confused by less grounded concepts. Similarly, philosophy can be approached from a number of mediums, including through stories. Many children’s stories and fables feature curious protagonists and interesting morals. Instead of explicitly instructing children through academic jargon, they can engage with the same questions about life and its origins more directly through the journey of characters in a story.
In conclusion, despite the risks of theory-heavy subjects for young learners, schools should embrace the challenge and seek less explicit teaching methodologies. This will help form the basis of a well-rounded education.
Answers
For extra practice, write an antonym (opposite word) on a piece of paper to help you remember the new vocabulary:
overly rigorous too intensive and challenging
mathematics numbers, geometry, calculus, algebra
philosophy the study of life, knowledge, etc.
mandatory compulsory
risk threat
struggle to cope have a tough time handling
adapt change to fit in with
subject matter what is studied in class
reason rationale
abstract not concrete and real
unable can’t do it
tell time as know what time it is because
essentially basically
metaphorical division symbolic cutting up
circle shape of the sun, for example
clock what you put on the wall to tell time
place too much emphasis focus too much on
grasp the concepts understand the ideas
tedious boring
inefficient not a good use of time
lack doesn’t have
cognitive ability mental capacity
apply general rules generalize
ethical considerations moral issues
everyday life daily life
capacity ability
recognize understand
apply abstractions force ideas onto
typically normally
later in adolescence as you get older (into your teenage years)
accessible can understand
key important
approach method
choice of materials what is used in class
complex complicated
equations numbers adding up and subtracting
real world scenarios real life situations
simple logic basic reasoning
introduced later learned after that
confused can’t understand
less grounded concepts too abstract
similarly the same
approached introduced
mediums types of ways
feature have in them
curious protagonists adventurers
morals ethics
academic jargon fancy words
engage with care about
origins where it comes from to begin with
directly clearly
journey adventure
despite regardless of
theory-heavy subjects classes with lots of abstract learning
embrace care about
challenge have difficulty
seek try to find
less explicit more implicit
teaching methodologies ways of teaching
basis foundation
well-rounded education good foundation for learning
Pronunciation
Practice saying the vocabulary below and use this tip about Google voice search:
ˈəʊvəli ˈrɪgərəs
ˌmæθɪˈmætɪks
fɪˈlɒsəfi
ˈmændətəri
rɪsk
ˈstrʌgl tuː kəʊp
əˈdæpt
ˈsʌbʤɪkt ˈmætə
ˈriːzn
ˈæbstrækt
ʌnˈeɪbl
tɛl taɪm æz
ɪˈsɛnʃəli
ˌmɛtəˈfɒrɪkəl dɪˈvɪʒən
ˈsɜːkl
klɒk
pleɪs tuː mʌʧ ˈɛmfəsɪs
grɑːsp ðə ˈkɒnsɛpts
ˈtiːdiəs
ˌɪnɪˈfɪʃənt
læk
ˈkɒgnɪtɪv əˈbɪlɪti
əˈplaɪ ˈʤɛnərəl ruːlz
ˈɛθɪkəl kənˌsɪdəˈreɪʃənz
ˈɛvrɪdeɪ laɪf
kəˈpæsɪti
ˈrɛkəgnaɪz
əˈplaɪ æbˈstrækʃ(ə)nz
ˈtɪpɪk(ə)li
ˈleɪtər ɪn ˌædəʊˈlɛsns
əkˈsɛsəbl
kiː
əˈprəʊʧ
ʧɔɪs ɒv məˈtɪərɪəlz
ˈkɒmplɛks
ɪˈkweɪʃənz
rɪəl wɜːld sɪˈnɑːrɪəʊz
ˈsɪmpl ˈlɒʤɪk
ˌɪntrəˈdjuːst ˈleɪtə
kənˈfjuːzd
lɛs ˈgraʊndɪd ˈkɒnsɛpts
ˈsɪmɪləli
əˈprəʊʧt
ˈmiːdiəmz
ˈfiːʧə
ˈkjʊərɪəs prəʊˈtægənɪsts
ˈmɒrəlz
ˌækəˈdɛmɪk ˈʤɑːgən
ɪnˈgeɪʤ wɪð
ˈɒrɪʤɪnz
dɪˈrɛktli
ˈʤɜːni
dɪsˈpaɪt
ˈθɪəri-ˈhɛvi ˈsʌbʤɪkts
ɪmˈbreɪs
ˈʧælɪnʤ
siːk
lɛs ɪksˈplɪsɪt
ˈtiːʧɪŋ ˌmɛθəˈdɒləʤiz
ˈbeɪsɪs
wɛl-ˈraʊndɪd ˌɛdju(ː)ˈkeɪʃən
Vocabulary Practice
I recommend getting a pencil and piece of paper because that aids memory. Then write down the missing vocabulary from my sample answer in your notebook:
Many feel that o_______________s subjects such as m_______________s and p______________y should not be m___________y for children. In my opinion, though there is a r____k students will s_______________e, teachers should be able to a______t the s__________________r.
One r________n these subjects should not be mandatory is they are often too a__________t for young children. Numbers themselves are abstract. This is why many children are u_______e to t________________s it is e____________y a m______________________n of a c________e into a c_____k. Teachers who p________________________________s on abstract numbers and ideas in their lessons will find that students may become bored because they are unable to g______________________s. Philosophy could also become t_________s and i_______________t if the students l______k the c__________________y to a_____________________________s and e___________________________s to e_____________________e. This c_____________y to r___________e and a_________________________s t_____________y develops l_____________________e.
However, these subjects can be made a______________e for children. The k__y is the a__________h of teachers and c___________________s. Math, for example, does not need to begin with c________x, abstract e_________s but could instead involve r_______________________s and s_____________c. Numbers could be i________________r as children tend to be c____________d by l___________________________s. S___________y, philosophy can be a___________d from a number of m__________s, including through stories. Many children’s stories and fables f_________e c_____________________s and interesting m_______s. Instead of explicitly instructing children through a______________n, they can e_____________h the same questions about life and its o__________s more d________y through the j__________y of characters in a story.
In conclusion, d_________e the risks of t______________________s for young learners, schools should e___________e the c___________e and s_____k l__________________t t__________________________s. This will help form the b______s of a w________________________n.
Listening Practice
Learn more about this topic by watching videos from The New York Times YouTube channel below and practice with these activities:
Reading Practice
Read more about this topic and use these ideas to practice:
https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/18/a-better-way-to-teach-math/
Speaking Practice
Practice with the following speaking questions from the real IELTS speaking exam:
Numbers
- Do you have a favourite number?
- Will you use numbers at work in the future?
- Were you good at math when you were younger?
- Do you think numbers are important?
Writing Practice
Practice with the related IELTS essay topic below:
To succeed in a business, one needs to know maths.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
I think what more important is that starting study subjects like maths and philosophy at a young age can really shape an intellectual brain. I am not saying to start with complexities like u said but also philosophy and maths can be really helpful in forcing them to think and ponder, moreover, they would become habitual to dealing with abstract topics from an early age.
Great point, Moon!
Definitely comes down to the execution of the teacher in the end, in my opinion!
Hi. Your essay is good. But I feel this does not answer the question (Task response).
The question is should the subject be compulsory or not.
So whatever side you are supporting – compulsory or not compulsory, you should given reasons to support your opinion.
Para 2 is good. But para 3, I feel does not answer the question, instead it explains ways how such subjects can be made easy for children rather than giving reasons to support why it should be compulsory.
Please clarify me if I am wrong
Hi Ree, thanks for your thoughtful comment!
In order to argue that they should be compulsory, I point out how they could be adapted for younger students.
That might seem indirect – but it is a way of saying that they if they can be adapted then they should be mandatory.
The conclusion makes that link more direct.
Is that clearer for you?
Yes. Thank you very much
No problem, happy to hear from you, Ree!