IELTS Essay: Local Environmenal Responsibility
Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment.
Do you agree or disagree?
Those who suggest individuals should be compelled to accept responsibility are hoping for a united effort from the general public. The entire reason the Earth faces potential catastrophe is because of over-population and consumer habits. There would be a noticeable improvement if individuals were forced to recycle, clean up litter in their neighborhoods and reduce their carbon footprint by not using private vehicles, single-use plastics, and airplanes. There is the added argument that it is important to instill public duty in the mind of the average person. The government could fix these problems but that would only enable bad behavior from citizens in the same way that an overly permissive parent engenders a spoiled child.
However, the impact from the steps mentioned above would be marginal compared to the regulations governments can enact on various industries. Individuals might not follow the mandates from governments and they would be extremely difficult to enforce in populous nations that value individual liberty such as India, the United States, and Brazil. If governments instead passed laws related to both small and large businesses they could combat global and local issues. Companies that contribute to air and water pollution could be severely fined and the businesses that profit the most from mass consumerism could be forced to institute more environmentally friendly policies. These simple reforms would have tremendous impact.
In conclusion, although this policy would help individuals become more active in their communities, it is more important for governments to enact sweeping regulations on corporations. In this way, the most progress will be made.
Analysis
- Paraphrase the overall essay topic.
- Write a clear opinion. Read more about introductions here.
1. Those who suggest individuals should be compelled to accept responsibility are hoping for a united effort from the general public. 2. The entire reason the Earth faces potential catastrophe is because of over-population and consumer habits. 3. There would be a noticeable improvement if individuals were forced to recycle, clean up litter in their neighborhoods and reduce their carbon footprint by not using private vehicles, single-use plastics, and airplanes. 4. There is the added argument that it is important to instill public duty in the mind of the average person. 5. The government could fix these problems but that would only enable bad behavior from citizens in the same way that an overly permissive parent engenders a spoiled child.
- Write a topic sentence with a clear main idea at the end.
- Explain your main idea.
- Develop it with specific or hypothetical examples.
- Keep developing it fully.
- You can have a second main idea.
1. However, the impact from the steps mentioned above would be marginal compared to the regulations governments can enact on various industries. 2. Individuals might not follow the mandates from governments and they would be extremely difficult to enforce in populous nations that value individual liberty such as India, the United States, and Brazil. 3. If governments instead passed laws related to both small and large businesses they could combat global and local issues. 4. Companies that contribute to air and water pollution could be severely fined and the businesses that profit the most from mass consumerism could be forced to institute more environmentally friendly policies. 5. These simple reforms would have tremendous impact.
- Write a new topic sentence with a new main idea at the end.
- Explain your new main idea.
- Include specific details and examples.
- I don’t usually use personal examples, but I did in this essay.
- Develop the example fully.
- Finish with a strong statement.
1. In conclusion, although this policy would help individuals become more active in their communities, it is more important for governments to enact sweeping regulations on corporations. 2. In this way, the most progress will be made.
- Summarise your main ideas.
- Include a final thought. Read more about conclusions here.
Vocabulary
Those who suggest individuals should be compelled to accept responsibility are hoping for a united effort from the general public. The entire reason the Earth faces potential catastrophe is because of over-population and consumer habits. There would be a noticeable improvement if individuals were forced to recycle, clean up litter in their neighborhoods and reduce their carbon footprint by not using private vehicles, single-use plastics, and airplanes. There is the added argument that it is important to instill public duty in the mind of the average person. The government could fix these problems but that would only enable bad behavior from citizens in the same way that an overly permissive parent engenders a spoiled child.
However, the impact from the steps mentioned above would be marginal compared to the regulations governments can enact on various industries. Individuals might not follow the mandates from governments and they would be extremely difficult to enforce in populous nations that value individual liberty such as India, the United States, and Brazil. If governments instead passed laws related to both small and large businesses they could combat global and local issues. Companies that contribute to air and water pollution could be severely fined and the businesses that profit the most from mass consumerism could be forced to institute more environmentally friendly policies. These simple reforms would have tremendous impact.
In conclusion, although this policy would help individuals become more active in their communities, it is more important for governments to enact sweeping regulations on corporations. In this way, the most progress will be made.
Answers
suggest say
compelled have to
accept responsibility take on the duty
hoping for ideally
united effort working together
general public people
entire reason whole justification
faces potential catastrophe combats possible harm
over-population too many people
consumer habits what people buy
noticeable improvement clear progress
recycle re-use
clean up litter pick up trash
neighborhoods communities
reduce cut down on
carbon footprint what you produce personally that impacts the environment
private vehicles cars, bikes, etc.
single-use plastics bottles, bags, etc.
added argument additional point
instill public duty engender care for all society
the average person normal resident
problems issues
enable allow for
in the same way that the same as
overly permissive letting them get away with too much
engenders creates
spoiled child kid who is not disciplined
mentioned above detailed before
marginal small
regulations laws
enact pass
various industries different sectors
mandates orders
extremely difficult very hard
enforce make sure it is followed
populous nations countries with many people
value individual liberty care about freedom
instead rather than
related to concerning
combat global fight international
local issues problems from near you
contribute add ot
severely fined have to pay a lot
profit the most get more out of
mass consumerism people buying things
institute put in place
environmentally friendly policies reforms good for nature
simple reforms basic changes
tremendous impact big effect
policy reform
active not passive
sweeping regulations big laws
progress getting better
Pronunciation
ˈɑːgjuː
sʌʧ ə ˈprɛsɪŋ θrɛt ðæt
ˈɪʃuː ˈmændeɪts
rɪsˈpɒnsəbl fɔː prəˈtɛktɪŋ
ˈləʊkəl ɪnˈvaɪərənmənt
reɪz ɪnˌvaɪərənˈmɛntl əˈweənəs
nɒt ədˈvaɪzəbl
ˈʌðə stɛps
ˈprɒdjuːs rɪˈzʌlts
səˈʤɛst
kəmˈpɛld
əkˈsɛpt rɪsˌpɒnsəˈbɪlɪti
ˈhəʊpɪŋ fɔː
jʊˈnaɪtɪd ˈɛfət
ˈʤɛnərəl ˈpʌblɪk
ɪnˈtaɪə ˈriːzn
ˈfeɪsɪz pəʊˈtɛnʃəl kəˈtæstrəfi
ˈəʊvə-ˌpɒpjʊˈleɪʃən
kənˈsjuːmə ˈhæbɪts
ˈnəʊtɪsəbl ɪmˈpruːvmənt
ˌriːˈsaɪkl
kliːn ʌp ˈlɪtə
ˈneɪbəhʊdz
rɪˈdjuːs
ˈkɑːbən ˈfʊtprɪnt
ˈpraɪvɪt ˈviːɪklz
ˈsɪŋgl-juːz ˈplæstɪks
ˈædɪd ˈɑːgjʊmənt
ɪnˈstɪl ˈpʌblɪk ˈdjuːti
ði ˈævərɪʤ ˈpɜːsn
ˈprɒbləmz
ɪˈneɪbl
ɪn ðə seɪm weɪ ðæt
ˈəʊvəli pəˈmɪsɪv
ɪnˈʤɛndəz
spɔːɪld ʧaɪld
ˈmɛnʃənd əˈbʌv
ˈmɑːʤɪnəl
ˌrɛgjʊˈleɪʃənz
ɪˈnækt
ˈveərɪəs ˈɪndəstriz
ˈmændeɪts
ɪksˈtriːmli ˈdɪfɪkəlt
ɪnˈfɔːs
ˈpɒpjʊləs ˈneɪʃənz
ˈvæljuː ˌɪndɪˈvɪdjʊəl ˈlɪbəti
ɪnˈstɛd
rɪˈleɪtɪd tuː
ˈkɒmbæt ˈgləʊbəl
ˈləʊkəl ˈɪʃuːz
kənˈtrɪbju(ː)t
sɪˈvɪəli faɪnd
ˈprɒfɪt ðə məʊst
mæs kənˈsjuːmərɪz(ə)m
ˈɪnstɪtjuːt
ɪnˌvaɪərənˈmɛntli ˈfrɛndli ˈpɒlɪsiz
ˈsɪmpl ˌriːˈfɔːmz
trɪˈmɛndəs ˈɪmpækt
ˈpɒlɪsi
ˈæktɪv
ˈswiːpɪŋ ˌrɛgjʊˈleɪʃənz
ˈprəʊgrəs
Vocabulary Practice
Those who s__________t individuals should be c_______________d to a_____________________y are h______________r a u____________t from the g_______________c. The e____________n the Earth f_________________________e is because of o_____________________n and c__________________s. There would be a n__________________t if individuals were forced to r__________e, c_______________r in their n_________________s and r________e their c_________________t by not using p_________________s, s____________________s, and airplanes. There is the a_________________t that it is important to i______________________y in the mind of t_________________n. The government could fix these p___________s but that would only e_________e bad behavior from citizens i_____________________t an o___________________e parent e____________s a s_____________d.
However, the impact from the steps m__________________e would be m________l compared to the re___________s governments can e______t on v_________________s. Individuals might not follow the m__________s from governments and they would be e__________________t to e__________e in p_______________s that v___________________y such as India, the United States, and Brazil. If governments i_________d passed laws r_________o both small and large businesses they could c________________l and l_____________s. Companies that c____________e to air and water pollution could be s____________d and the businesses that p_________________t from m_______________m could be forced to i__________e more e__________________________________s. These s_______________s would have t__________________t.
In conclusion, although this p_____y would help individuals become more a_____e in their communities, it is more important for governments to enact s___________________s on corporations. In this way, the most p________s will be made.
Listening Practice
Reading Practice
Speaking Practice
Environment
- Why do people throw rubbish the streets?
- How can people be encouraged to not litter?
- What are the results of littering?
- What steps has your government taken to make people pick up after themselves?
- Do the efforts of a single person have an impact on the world as a whole?
Writing Practice
Developing the economy will always damage the environment.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a statement that governments should settle a law to force citizens to take care of their local environment. In my opinion, it is unreasonable to set such a law because governments have the ability and should take the responsibility for looking after public issues, including environment problems.
The officials in government should serve citizens instead of asking them to solve the problems that governments concern. The tax that citizens pay is used to hire governments to solve public problems, including protecting the local environment. In most countries, there is a department to deal with issues about the environment, and they should take their responsibility. Although some people are warm-hearted and hopping for chances to protect the earth, it is still too crude to require all citizens to solve the enviroment problems.
Citizens can not solve the local environment problems well. Citizens need to work hard for their lives instead of taking public responsibility. It is harsh for them to spend more time on such problems. Moreover, it is a big issue, which needs a conspicuously complete plan. It would be difficult for individuals to solve such problems. From a city procepective, people can not decide the commercial area and forest protection area in the city, which can only be done by governments. Let us take rubbish recycling as an example of small issues. People can classify the rubbish according to a certain rule, but the rule can only be set and supervised by governments.
In sum, local environment problems should be solved by governments, because of their responsibility and capacity. In addition, people should follow the political plan to build a clearer environment.
Nice, Gakki!
Nice summary at the end and strong hypothetical examples too!