This is an IELTS writing task 2 sample answer essay on the topic of working life and job security from the general training IELTS exam.
Please consider supporting me on Patreon.com/howtodoielts to receive my full, exclusive IELTS Ebooks!
Dave
IELTS Essay: Working Life and Job Security
Some people say that individuals should change jobs during their working life often while others believe that doing the same job has advantages to individuals, companies, and society.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Many are of the opinion that it is preferable for individuals, corporations and society more generally for workers to remain in the same position long-term. Although such a contention has transparent benefits, I am largely in disagreement.
Those who argue against employment mobility point out how it can facilitate consistent progress for all parties involved. Firstly, companies are the most likely to profit since they will not have to hire and train new employees and will be able to cultivate a positive company ethos. As companies flourish, it necessarily follows that individuals will be able to gain promotions and raises. This will enable a higher standard of living. Finally, society itself will benefit as the private and public world can achieve a balanced system of mutual benefits. There is then less likelihood of unemployment and civil unrest.
However, I would argue the opportunities that individuals may miss by not changing jobs are more significant. A worker who is unhappy in their job has the power to improve the situation. For instance, if a person is under-utilized and underpaid in their current position, they could apply for a new job or move to a new sector. If the move is successful, they will not regret their decision and if not they can always apply for another job. In the aggregate, citizens finding more satisfying jobs and taking full advantage of their latent abilities will lead to a happier society. This will in turn grow the economy and corporations are likely to be more productive with an engaged workforce.
In conclusion, the tangible impact of remaining in a single job does not outweigh the potential gain for individuals, and society by extension, when seeking a varied career path. There are exceptions to this but most workers should be willing to switch jobs when possible.
Analysis
1. Many are of the opinion that it is preferable for individuals, corporations and society more generally for workers to remain in the same position long-term. 2. Although such a contention has transparent benefits, I am largely in disagreement.
- Paraphrase the overall essay topic.
- Write a clear opinion. Read more about introductions here.
1. Those who argue against employment mobility point out how it can facilitate consistent progress for all parties involved. 2. Firstly, companies are the most likely to profit since they will not have to hire and train new employees and will be able to cultivate a positive company ethos. 3. As companies flourish, it necessarily follows that individuals will be able to gain promotions and raises. 4. This will enable a higher standard of living. 5. Finally, society itself will benefit as the private and public world can achieve a balanced system of mutual benefits. 6. There is then less likelihood of unemployment and civil unrest.
- Write a topic sentence with a clear main idea at the end.
- Explain your main idea.
- Develop it with specific or hypothetical examples.
- Keep developing it fully.
- Finish development.
- Make sure you have dealt with all points in the topic.
1. However, I would argue the opportunities that individuals may miss by not changing jobs are more significant. 2. A worker who is unhappy in their job has the power to improve the situation. 3. For instance, if a person is under-utilized and underpaid in their current position, they could apply for a new job or move to a new sector. 4. If the move is successful, they will not regret their decision and if not they can always apply for another job. 5. In the aggregate, citizens finding more satisfying jobs and taking full advantage of their latent abilities will lead to a happier society. 6. This will in turn grow the economy and corporations are likely to be more productive with an engaged workforce.
- Write a new topic sentence with a new main idea at the end.
- Explain your new main idea.
- Include specific details and examples.
- Add as much information as you can and make sure it links logically.
- Develop the example fully.
- Finish the paragraph strong.
1. In conclusion, the tangible impact of remaining in a single job does not outweigh the potential gain for individuals, and society by extension, when seeking a varied career path. 2. There are exceptions to this but most workers should be willing to switch jobs when possible.
- Summarise your main ideas.
- Include a final thought. Read more about conclusions here.
Vocabulary
Many are of the opinion that it is preferable for individuals, corporations and society more generally for workers to remain in the same position long-term. Although such a contention has transparent benefits, I am largely in disagreement.
Those who argue against employment mobility point out how it can facilitate consistent progress for all parties involved. Firstly, companies are the most likely to profit since they will not have to hire and train new employees and will be able to cultivate a positive company ethos. As companies flourish, it necessarily follows that individuals will be able to gain promotions and raises. This will enable a higher standard of living. Finally, society itself will benefit as the private and public world can achieve a balanced system of mutual benefits. There is then less likelihood of unemployment and civil unrest.
However, I would argue the opportunities that individuals may miss by not changing jobs are more significant. A worker who is unhappy in their job has the power to improve the situation. For instance, if a person is under-utilized and underpaid in their current position, they could apply for a new job or move to a new sector. If the move is successful, they will not regret their decision and if not they can always apply for another job. In the aggregate, citizens finding more satisfying jobs and taking full advantage of their latent abilities will lead to a happier society. This will in turn grow the economy and corporations are likely to be more productive with an engaged workforce.
In conclusion, the tangible impact of remaining in a single job does not outweigh the potential gain for individuals, and society by extension, when seeking a varied career path. There are exceptions to this but most workers should be willing to switch jobs when possible.
Answers
preferable better
individuals people
corporations companies
society more generally all people in country
workers employees
remain stay
position long-term job for a long time
although however
contention belief
transparent benefits clear advantages
largely mostly
those who argue against people who disagree with
employment mobility changing jobs
point out argue
facilitate consistent progress enable continued growth
parties involved groups, people engaged with this
hire give a job
train teach about
cultivate help grow
positive company ethos good environment
flourish do really well
necessarily follows of necessity causes
gain promotions get a new job
raises increases
enable allow for
higher standard of living better quality of life
private and public personal and society
achieve a balanced system of mutual benefits good social order
less likelihood not as much of a chance
unemployment no job
civil unrest people unhappy in society
opportunities chances
significant meaningful
improve the situation make things better
under-utilized not used enough
underpaid not paid enough money
current right now
new sector different field
regret feel bad about, wish it was different
in the aggregate combined
citizens residents, people in a country
satisfying fulfilling
taking full advantage do the most to enjoy
latent abilities what you are capable of doing
in turn then
productive efficient
engaged workforce workers who care
tangible impact real effect
outweigh stronger than
potential possible
by extension included in this
seeking a varied career path try different jobs
exceptions cases outside the norm
willing happy to
switch change
when possible if they can
Pronunciation
ˈprɛfərəbl
ˌɪndɪˈvɪdjʊəlz
ˌkɔːpəˈreɪʃənz
səˈsaɪəti mɔː ˈʤɛnərəli
ˈwɜːkəz
rɪˈmeɪn
pəˈzɪʃən ˈlɒŋtɜːm
ɔːlˈðəʊ
kənˈtɛnʃən
trænsˈpeərənt ˈbɛnɪfɪts
ˈlɑːʤli
ðəʊz huː ˈɑːgjuː əˈgɛnst
ɪmˈplɔɪmənt məʊˈbɪlɪti
pɔɪnt aʊt
fəˈsɪlɪteɪt kənˈsɪstənt ˈprəʊgrəs
ˈpɑːtiz ɪnˈvɒlvd
ˈhaɪə
treɪn
ˈkʌltɪveɪt
ˈpɒzətɪv ˈkʌmpəni ˈiːθɒs
ˈflʌrɪʃ,
ˈnɛsɪsərɪli ˈfɒləʊz
geɪn prəˈməʊʃənz
ˈreɪzɪz
ɪˈneɪbl
ˈhaɪə ˈstændəd ɒv ˈlɪvɪŋ
ˈpraɪvɪt ænd ˈpʌblɪk
əˈʧiːv ə ˈbælənst ˈsɪstɪm ɒv ˈmjuːtjʊəl ˈbɛnɪfɪts
lɛs ˈlaɪklɪhʊd
ˌʌnɪmˈplɔɪmənt
ˈsɪvl ʌnˈrɛst
ˌɒpəˈtjuːnɪtiz
sɪgˈnɪfɪkənt
ɪmˈpruːv ðə ˌsɪtjʊˈeɪʃən
ˈʌndə-ˈjuːtɪˌlaɪzd
ˌʌndəˈpeɪd
ˈkʌrənt
njuː ˈsɛktə
rɪˈgrɛt
ɪn ði ˈægrɪgɪt
ˈsɪtɪznz
ˈsætɪsfaɪɪŋ
ˈteɪkɪŋ fʊl ədˈvɑːntɪʤ
ˈleɪtənt əˈbɪlɪtiz
ɪn tɜːn
prəˈdʌktɪv
ɪnˈgeɪʤd ˈwɜːkˌfɔːs
ˈtænʤəbl ˈɪmpækt
aʊtˈweɪ
pəʊˈtɛnʃəl
baɪ ɪksˈtɛnʃən,
ˈsiːkɪŋ ə ˈveərɪd kəˈrɪə pɑːθ
ɪkˈsɛpʃənz
ˈwɪlɪŋ
swɪʧ
wɛn ˈpɒsəbl
Vocabulary Practice
Many are of the opinion that it is p____________e for i___________s, c__________s and s______________________y for w_________s to r________n in the same p_________________m. A__________h such a c________n has t_________________s, I am l_______y in disagreement.
T________________________________t e___________________y p____________t how it can f___________e c__________________s for all p_______________d. Firstly, companies are the most likely to profit since they will not have to h____e and t______n new employees and will be able to c__________e a p___________________s. As companies f________h, it n____________s that individuals will be able to g___________________s and r________s. This will e_______e a h________________g. Finally, society itself will benefit as the p__________________c world can a_________________________________________s. There is then less l___________d of u____________t and c____________t.
However, I would argue the o_______________s that individuals may miss by not changing jobs are more s___________t. A worker who is unhappy in their job has the power to i___________________n. For instance, if a person is u________d and u__________d in their c________t position, they could apply for a new job or move to a n__________r. If the move is successful, they will not r________t their decision and if not they can always apply for another job. I______________e, c_______s finding more s____________g jobs and t____________________e of their l_____________s will lead to a happier society. This will i________n grow the economy and corporations are likely to be more p___________e with an e___________________e.
In conclusion, the t______________t of remaining in a single job does not o________h the p_________l gain for individuals, and society b__________n, when s___________________________h. There are e________s to this but most workers should be w_______g to s______h jobs w_____________e.
Listening Practice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaUCiKTNBxQ
Reading Practice
https://www.glassdoor.com/blog/interview-questions-to-ask-to-evaluate-a-companys-work-life-balance/
Speaking Practice
Work (Model answer available on my Patreon)
- Are you student or are you working now?
- What do you like about your job/school at the moment?
- What job would you like to do in the future?
Writing Practice
Many people try to balance work and other parts of their life. However, this is very difficult to do.
What are the problems associated with this?
What is the best way to achieve a better balance?
0 Comments