This is my IELTS writing task 2 sample answer essay on the topic of urban infrastructure from the general training exam.
Be sure to sign up for my full IELTS EBooks here to support my efforts to keep writing these essays for students:
Dave
IELTS General Training Essay: Urban Infrastructure
Some believe that traffic problems in cities can best be resolved by investing in urban infrastructure while others feel there are superior solutions.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
Many policymakers feel that the optimal counter to traffic issues in urban areas is increased funding for infrastructure. In my opinion, though this funding may have a marginal effect, there are other, potentially more impactful, regulations.
Supporters of investment in infrastructure contend it is a direct and pragmatic solution. As cities become larger, they face inevitable traffic problems caused by overcrowding and deteriorating roads. Improving the existing infrastructure can include repaving these roads to reduce accidents and slow driving, building additional public transportation lines for subways, creating biking lanes, widening streets, constructing overpasses, and so on. Combined, the theoretical result of these changes will be an alleviation of current strain on transport systems. However, in practice, in large cities such as New York City, rarely produce any actual difference in traffic conditions as they cannot keep pace with growing populations.
Instead, governments must consider more drastic policies. The first such reform would be to ban or severely limit the use of private vehicles. A good example of this would be in certain European cities that have enacted single day bans or raised taxes on automobile purchases. Since cars occupy the majority of the space on roads, while often only transporting one or two individuals, they are the least efficient and slowest modes of travel. Secondly, governments can subtly shift housing policies to engender dramatic effects. Instead of allowing cities to build upwards, through skyscrapers and tall apartment buildings, they can limit the number of floors on buildings to encourage a more horizontal cityscape. The result of this would be to spread out workplaces and lower congestion levels generally.
In conclusion, there is little doubt that improved infrastructure could alleviate traffic congestion in cities to an extent; however, the best remedy is to pass laws concerning private vehicles and housing. Governments should implement these long-term policies over short-term fixes.
Analysis
1. Many policymakers feel that the optimal counter to traffic issues in urban areas is increased funding for infrastructure. 2. In my opinion, though this funding may have a marginal effect, there are other, potentially more impactful, regulations.
- Paraphrase the overall essay topic.
- Write a clear opinion. Read more about introductions here.
1. Supporters of investment in infrastructure contend it is a direct and pragmatic solution. 2. As cities become larger, they face inevitable traffic problems caused by overcrowding and deteriorating roads. 3. Improving the existing infrastructure can include repaving these roads to reduce accidents and slow driving, building additional public transportation lines for subways, creating biking lanes, widening streets, constructing overpasses, and so on. 4. Combined, the theoretical result of these changes will be an alleviation of current strain on transport systems. 5. However, in practice, in large cities such as New York City, rarely produce any actual difference in traffic conditions as they cannot keep pace with growing populations.
- Write a topic sentence with a clear main idea at the end.
- Explain your main idea.
- Develop it with specific or hypothetical examples.
- Keep developing it fully.
- You can sometimes include the counterpoint here too.
1. Instead, governments must consider more drastic policies. 2. The first such reform would be to ban or severely limit the use of private vehicles. 3. A good example of this would be in certain European cities that have enacted single day bans or raised taxes on automobile purchases. 4. Since cars occupy the majority of the space on roads, while often only transporting one or two individuals, they are the least efficient and slowest modes of travel. Secondly, governments can subtly shift housing policies to engender dramatic effects. 5. Instead of allowing cities to build upwards, through skyscrapers and tall apartment buildings, they can limit the number of floors on buildings to encourage a more horizontal cityscape. 6. The result of this would be to spread out workplaces and lower congestion levels generally.
- Write a new topic sentence with a new main idea at the end.
- Explain your new main idea.
- Include specific details and examples.
- Add as much information as you can and make sure it links logically.
- Continue your development.
- Finish the paragraph strong.
1. In conclusion, there is little doubt that improved infrastructure could alleviate traffic congestion in cities to an extent; however, the best remedy is to pass laws concerning private vehicles and housing. 2. Governments should implement these long-term policies over short-term fixes.
- Summarise your main ideas.
- Include a final thought. Read more about conclusions here.
Vocabulary
What do the words in bold below mean? Make some notes on paper to aid memory and then check below.
Many policymakers feel that the optimal counter to traffic issues in urban areas is increased funding for infrastructure. In my opinion, though this funding may have a marginal effect, there are other, potentially more impactful, regulations.
Supporters of investment in infrastructure contend it is a direct and pragmatic solution. As cities become larger, they face inevitable traffic problems caused by overcrowding and deteriorating roads. Improving the existing infrastructure can include repaving these roads to reduce accidents and slow driving, building additional public transportation lines for subways, creating biking lanes, widening streets, constructing overpasses, and so on. Combined, the theoretical result of these changes will be an alleviation of current strain on transport systems. However, in practice, in large cities such as New York City, rarely produce any actual difference in traffic conditions as they cannot keep pace with growing populations.
Instead, governments must consider more drastic policies. The first such reform would be to ban or severely limit the use of private vehicles. A good example of this would be in certain European cities that have enacted single day bans or raised taxes on automobile purchases. Since cars occupy the majority of the space on roads, while often only transporting one or two individuals, they are the least efficient and slowest modes of travel. Secondly, governments can subtly shift housing policies to engender dramatic effects. Instead of allowing cities to build upwards, through skyscrapers and tall apartment buildings, they can limit the number of floors on buildings to encourage a more horizontal cityscape. The result of this would be to spread out workplaces and lower congestion levels generally.
In conclusion, there is little doubt that improved infrastructure could alleviate traffic congestion in cities to an extent; however, the best remedy is to pass laws concerning private vehicles and housing. Governments should implement these long-term policies over short-term fixes.
Answers
For extra practice, write an antonym (opposite word) on a piece of paper to help you remember the new vocabulary:
policymakers politicians, the authorities
optimal counter best solution
traffic issues problems related to too many cars
urban areas cities
increased funding for infrastructure more money for buildings
marginal effect small impact
potentially more impactful possibly greater effect
regulations rules and laws
Supporters of investment in people in favor of funding
contend argue
direct straightforward
pragmatic useful
face inevitable traffic problems caused by overcrowding and deteriorating roads have to deal with issues from too many people and streets getting old
Improving the existing infrastructure fixing roads now
repaving putting down new pavement
reduce accidents fewer crashes
slow driving not going fast
building additional public transportation lines for subways adding on metro routes
creating biking lanes making space for bikes to ride
widening increasing
overpasses roads going over other ones
Combined in the aggregate
theoretical result what could happen
alleviation fixing
current strain on transport systems pressure on roads, transport, etc.
in practice in reality
rarely produce doesn’t often happen
actual difference in traffic conditions real change for traffic
keep pace with growing populations match the growth of people living there
Instead rather than
drastic policies strong laws
reform change
ban prohibit
severely limit really contain/stop
private vehicles cars
enacted single day bans or raised taxes on automobile purchases create laws where you can’t drive one day or make cars more expensive
occupy take up space
majority most of
least efficient wastes time and energy
slowest modes of travel not the fastest ways to go
subtly shift housing policies slightly change how much it costs
engender dramatic effects create a big impact
build upwards construct tall apartment buildings
skyscrapers tall buildings
limit contain
encourage a more horizontal cityscape make the city more spread out
spread out workplaces
lower less than
generally overall
there is little doubt that few would question
alleviate fix
congestion traffic
to an extent to some degree
best remedy optimal fix
pass laws concerning private vehicles and housing make rules related to cars and real estate
implement put in place
long-term policies over short-term fixes think about the future, not just now
Pronunciation
Practice saying the vocabulary below and use this tip about Google voice search:
dɪsˈkʌs bəʊθ saɪdz ænd gɪv jɔːr əʊn əˈpɪnjən
ˈpɒlɪsi ˈmeɪkəz
ˈɒptɪməl ˈkaʊntə
ˈtræfɪk ˈɪʃuːz
ˈɜːbən ˈeərɪəz
ɪnˈkriːst ˈfʌndɪŋ fɔːr ˈɪnfrəˌstrʌkʧə
ˈmɑːʤɪnəl ɪˈfɛkt
pəʊˈtɛnʃəli mɔːr ˈɪmpæktf(ə)l
ˌrɛgjʊˈleɪʃənz
səˈpɔːtəz ɒv ɪnˈvɛstmənt ɪn
kənˈtɛnd
dɪˈrɛkt
prægˈmætɪk
feɪs ɪnˈɛvɪtəbl ˈtræfɪk ˈprɒbləmz kɔːzd baɪ ˌəʊvəˈkraʊdɪŋ ænd dɪˈtɪərɪəreɪtɪŋ rəʊdz
ɪmˈpruːvɪŋ ði ɪgˈzɪstɪŋ ˈɪnfrəˌstrʌkʧə
ˌriːˈpeɪvɪŋ
rɪˈdjuːs ˈæksɪdənts
sləʊ ˈdraɪvɪŋ
ˈbɪldɪŋ əˈdɪʃənl ˈpʌblɪk ˌtrænspɔːˈteɪʃən laɪnz fɔː ˈsʌbweɪz
kri(ː)ˈeɪtɪŋ ˈbaɪkɪŋ leɪnz
ˈwaɪdnɪŋ
ˈəʊvəpɑːsɪz
kəmˈbaɪnd
θɪəˈrɛtɪkəl rɪˈzʌlt
əˌliːvɪˈeɪʃ(ə)n
ˈkʌrənt streɪn ɒn ˈtrænspɔːt ˈsɪstɪmz
ɪn ˈpræktɪs
ˈreəli ˈprɒdjuːs
ˈækʧʊəl ˈdɪfrəns ɪn ˈtræfɪk kənˈdɪʃənz
kiːp peɪs wɪð ˈgrəʊɪŋ ˌpɒpjʊˈleɪʃənz
ɪnˈstɛd
ˈdræstɪk ˈpɒlɪsiz
ˌriːˈfɔːm
bæn
sɪˈvɪəli ˈlɪmɪt
ˈpraɪvɪt ˈviːɪklz
ɪˈnæktɪd ˈsɪŋgl deɪ bænz ɔː reɪzd ˈtæksɪz ɒn ˈɔːtəməʊbiːl ˈpɜːʧəsɪz
ˈɒkjʊpaɪ
məˈʤɒrɪti
liːst ɪˈfɪʃənt
ˈsləʊɪst məʊdz ɒv ˈtrævl
ˈsʌtli ʃɪft ˈhaʊzɪŋ ˈpɒlɪsiz
ɪnˈʤɛndə drəˈmætɪk ɪˈfɛkts
bɪld ˈʌpwədz
ˈskaɪˌskreɪpəz
ˈlɪmɪt
ɪnˈkʌrɪʤ ə mɔː ˌhɒrɪˈzɒntl ˈsɪti skeɪp
sprɛd aʊt ˈwɜːkˌpleɪsɪz
ˈləʊə
ˈʤɛnərəli
ðeər ɪz ˈlɪtl daʊt ðæt
əˈliːvɪeɪt
kənˈʤɛsʧən
tuː ən ɪksˈtɛnt
bɛst ˈrɛmɪdi
pɑːs lɔːz kənˈsɜːnɪŋ ˈpraɪvɪt ˈviːɪklz ænd ˈhaʊzɪŋ
ˈɪmplɪmənt
ˈlɒŋtɜːm ˈpɒlɪsiz ˈəʊvə ʃɔːt-tɜːm ˈfɪksɪz
Vocabulary Practice
Many p___________s feel that the o__________________r to t________________s in u___________s is i_________________________________e. In my opinion, though this funding may have a m____________t, there are other, p_______________________________l, r___________s.
S_____________________________n infrastructure c_________d it is a d_______t and p_____________c solution. As cities become larger, they f_________________________________________________________________s. I_______________________________e can include r____________g these roads to r________________s and s___________g, b____________________________________________________________________s, c______________________s, w________g streets, constructing o______________s, and so on. C____________d, the t__________________________t of these changes will be an a__________________n of c________________________________________s. However, i_____________e, in large cities such as New York City, r_________________e any a______________________________________s as they cannot k______________________________________s.
I__________d, governments must consider more d_____________________s. The first such r_______m would be to b__n or s_______________t the use of p______________s. A good example of this would be in certain European cities that have e__________________________________________________s. Since cars o_______y the m________y of the space on roads, while often only transporting one or two individuals, they are the l_______________t and s__________________________l. Secondly, governments can s________________________s to e___________________________s. Instead of allowing cities to b_____________s, through s___________s and tall apartment buildings, they can l______t the number of floors on buildings to e___________________________________e. The result of this would be to s__________________________s and l_______r congestion levels g_____________y.
In conclusion, t___________________t improved infrastructure could a___________e traffic c___________n in cities t___________t; however, the b_____________y is to p________________________________________________g. Governments should i____________t these l____________________________________________s.
Listening Practice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NenDzgLTxEU
Reading Practice
https://www.planetware.com/world/top-cities-in-the-world-to-visit-eng-1-39.htm
Speaking Practice
Cities
- Have you ever lived in a city?
- What do you enjoy most about living in the city?
- Which city would you like to live in in the future?
- Do most people in your country live in cities?
Writing Practice
Some people think the main purpose of school is to turn children into good citizens and workers, rather than to benefit them as individuals.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Hi, this could be a suggestion or a question. According to the IELTS IDP score breakdown sheet, this is a 3-part question; first two paragraphs explaining the two different views and in the 3rd paragraph elaborating your opinion. Is it necessary to follow this requirement?
Hi, this could be a suggestion or a question. According to the IELTS IDP score breakdown sheet, this is a 3-part question; first two paragraphs explaining the two different views and in the 3rd paragraph elaborating your opinion. Is it necessary to follow this requirement?