This is an IELTS writing task 2 sample answer essay on the topic of moving to a new house from real IELTS exam.
It is a letter to a friend so you’ll notice that the level of formality is very low.
You don’t have to write it this informal, but it shouldn’t be as formal as a letter to a company or your boss.
Read it all below!
Please consider signing up for my Patreon here in order to support my efforts and receive exclusive Ebooks and materials related to IELTS!
Dave
Before reading, listen to the audio and take notes to improve your listening skills:
IELTS Writing Task 1 Sample Answer Letter: Moving to a New House (Real Past IELTS Exam/Test)
Write a letter to a friend who just moved into a new house that you are sending a gift to. Include
What the gift is
Why you chose it
How it will be delivered
Real Past IELTS Exam/Test
Hey buddy,
Heard you’re moving house and I wanted to send you a gift. When you open it, you might not recognise it exactly. That’s because it is a very special kind of seed that I got when I was travelling in India a few months back. It will grow a tree that you can’t normally find here in the states. Don’t remember the exact name of it, to be honest.
I got it for you because I know you’re not that into nature and I thought this would spur you on. I guarantee no one in your neighborhood will have a tree like this. If we can trust the guy I bought them from, it’ll also grow some kind of tropical fruit so you’ve got that to look forward to as well.
I couldn’t enclose it in this letter because I was afraid it might get damaged in transit. It will arrive sometime in the next week in a box marked fragile from FedEx. Keep an eye out so no one snatches it if they leave it on your doorstep.
Looking out for you!
Dave
Analysis
1. Hey buddy,
2. Heard you’re moving house and I wanted to send you a gift. 3. When you open it, you might not recognise it exactly. 4. That’s because it is a very special kind of seed that I got when I was travelling in India a few months back. 5. It will grow a tree that you can’t normally find here in the states. 6. Don’t remember the exact name of it, to be honest.
Write ‘hi’ or ‘hey’ or even ‘dear’ for an informal letter.
Mention why you are writing.
Begin to cover the first point – what it is.
Include a few sentences to cover theis point.
Keep talking about the first point.
Conclude the paragraph when you’ve finished the first point.
1. I got it for you because I know you’re not that into nature and I thought this would spur you on. 2. I guarantee no one in your neighborhood will have a tree like this. 3. If we can trust the guy I bought them from, it’ll also grow some kind of tropical fruit so you’ve got that to look forward to as well.
Start writing about the second point.
Include 2 – 3 sentences about the second paragraph.
Finish the paragraph when the second point is done.
1. I couldn’t enclose it in this letter because I was afraid it might get damaged in transit. 2. It will arrive sometime in the next week in a box marked fragile from FedEx. 3. Keep an eye out so no one snatches it if they leave it on your doorstep.
4. Looking out for you!
5. Dave
Start writing about the 3rd point.
Again, include 2 – 3 sentences about the 3rd point.
Conclude the paragraph.
Write sincerely or best or regards or the informal phrase that I use!
Write your name at the end.
Vocabulary
What do the words in bold mean?
Hey buddy,
Heard you’re moving house and I wanted to send you a gift. When you open it, you might not recognise it exactly. That’s because it is a very special kind of seed that I got when I was travelling in India a few months back. It will grow a tree that you can’t normally find here in the states. Don’t remember the exact name of it, to be honest.
I got it for you because I know you’re not that into nature and I thought this would spur you on. I guarantee no one in your neighborhood will have a tree like this. If we can trust the guy I bought them from, it’ll also grow some kind of tropical fruit so you’ve got that to look forward to as well.
I couldn’t enclose it in this letter because I was afraid it might get damaged in transit. It will arrive sometime in the next week in a box marked fragile from FedEx. Keep an eye out so no one snatches it if they leave it on your doorstep.
Looking out for you!
Dave
Answers
buddy friend/pal
heard found out
moving house moving to a new place
recognise know
exactly precisely
seed for growing a plant/tree
a few months back 3 months ago (or so)
normally typically
to be honest frankly
not that into nature doesn’t enjoy the outside world
spur you on encourage you
guarantee promise
trust believe in
tropical fruit fruit from an exotic country
you’ve got that to look forward to that’s something to hope for
enclose included
get damaged in transit get hurt when being transported
box marked fragile handle with care package
keep an eye out look for
snatches takes
doorstep front door
looking out for you thinking of your best interests
H_________d you’re m_____________e and I wanted to send you a gift. When you open it, you might not r____________e it e_________y. That’s because it is a very special kind of s_______d that I got when I was travelling in India a____________________k. It will grow a tree that you can’t n____________y find here in the states. Don’t remember the exact name of it, t________________t.
I got it for you because I know you’re n__________________e and I thought this would s_________________n. I g__________________e no one in your neighborhood will have a tree like this. If we can t_________t the guy I bought them from, it’ll also grow some kind of t_____________t so y________________________________o as well.
I couldn’t e___________e it in this letter because I was afraid it might g____________________________t. It will arrive sometime in the next week in a b______________________e from FedEx. K__________________t so no one s___________s it if they leave it on your d____________p.
L_________________________u!
Dave
Listen and check:
Listening Practice
Watch the video below to learn more about moving house:
Throughout history, male leaders have led us into violence and conflict. If a society is governed by female leaders it will be more peaceful.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Real Past IELTS Exam/Test
Many are of the opinion the male inclination towards violence is the root of many international conflicts and societies ruled by women might be more peaceful. In my opinion, this is likely true.
The reason that some oppose this seemingly sexist viewpoint is based on past examples of female leaders. The sample size is much smaller but leaders like Margaret Thatcher, Cleopatra, Hilary Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, Queen Elisabeth I, Joan d’Arc and countless others have started, maintained, and escalated violent conflicts. There are very few examples of peaceful female leaders and those that exist can be matched proportionally with male leaders. The claim that women are more peaceful is not supported by historical evidence. A major caveat is that these are the exceptions and women rulers have held power in a world otherwise dominated by male hierarchy. It is impossible to know how peaceful the world would be if women held the majority of powerful positions.
Furthermore, men are naturally predisposed towards aggression. This stems from both biology and society. Men produce more testosterone than women and this has been shown to increase aggressive tendencies and violent behaviour. Men can curb this instinct but it has the potential to undermine their better nature at any moment. There are also societal forces at work that play on men’s pride. From a young age, boys are raised to be tough, to not back down, to not compromise and to idealise violent heroes. The majority of male role models are violent, ranging from historic figures to action stars and even videogame characters. It is hard to disentangle the roles of nature and nurture clearly but the end product of their combination is clear for both males and females.
In conclusion, males are more violent and women would likely be more peaceful given the opportunity to rule widely. The question of the desirability of ending all conflicts and its global impact is another matter.
Analysis
1. Many are of the opinion the male inclination towards violence is the root of many international conflicts and societies ruled by women might be more peaceful. 2. In my opinion, this is likely true.
Simply paraphrase the overall topic.
Write your opinion. You can include your topic sentences if you like.
1. The reason that some oppose this seemingly sexist viewpoint is based on past examples of female leaders. 2. The sample size is much smaller but leaders like Margaret Thatcher, Cleopatra, Hilary Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, Queen Elisabeth I, Joan d’Arc and countless others have started, maintained, and escalated violent conflicts. 3. There are very few examples of peaceful female leaders and those that exist can be matched proportionally with male leaders. 4. The claim that women are more peaceful is not supported by historical evidence. 5. A major caveat is that these are the exceptions and women rulers have held power in a world otherwise dominated by male hierarchy. 6. It is impossible to know how peaceful the world would be if women held the majority of powerful positions.
Write a clear topic sentence with your main idea at the end.
Begin to support it with specific female leaders.
Draw conclusions based on those leaders.
Conclude that argument.
Because I agree with the other side, I start to undermine this argument.
I finish undermining the opposing view here.
1. Furthermore, men are naturally predisposed towards aggression. 2. This stems from both biology and society. 3. Men produce more testosterone than women and this has been shown to increase aggressive tendencies and violent behaviour. 4. Men can curb this instinct but it has the potential to undermine their better nature at any moment. 5. There are also societal forces at work that play on men’s pride. 6. From a young age, boys are raised to be tough, to not back down, to not compromise and to idealise violent heroes. 7. The majority of male role models are violent, ranging from historic figures to action stars and even videogame characters. 8. It is hard to disentangle the roles of nature and nurture clearly but the end product of their combination is clear for both males and females.
Write another clear topic sentence with a main idea for the other viewpoint.
Begin developing it with specific ideas/details/examples.
Continue developing it.
Conclude how nature influences males.
Here I switch to the societal factors.
And develop those factors specifically.
I continue developing this.
I summarise how both might make men worse leaders compared to women.
1. In conclusion, males are more violent and women would likely be more peaceful given the opportunity to rule widely. 2. The question of the desirability of ending all conflicts and its global impact is another matter.
Repeat your opinion.
Add an extra detail/final thought for full marks from the examiner.
Vocabulary
What do the words in bold below mean?
Many are of the opinion the male inclination towards violence is the root of many international conflicts and societies ruled by women might be more peaceful. In my opinion, this is likely true.
The reason that some oppose this seemingly sexist viewpoint is based on past examples of female leaders. The sample size is much smaller but leaders like Margaret Thatcher, Cleopatra, Hilary Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, Queen Elisabeth I, Joan d’Arc and countless others have started, maintained, and escalated violent conflicts. There are very few examples of peaceful female leaders and those that exist can be matched proportionally with male leaders. The claim that women are more peaceful is not supported by historical evidence. A major caveat is that these are the exceptions and women rulers have held power in a world otherwise dominated by male hierarchy. It is impossible to know how peaceful the world would be if women held the majority of powerful positions.
Furthermore, men are naturally predisposed towards aggression. This stems from both biology and society. Men produce more testosterone than women and this has been shown to increase aggressive tendencies and violent behaviour. Men can curb this instinct but it has the potential to undermine their better nature at any moment. There are also societal forces at work that play on men’s pride. From a young age, boys are raised to be tough, to not back down, to not compromise and to idealise violent heroes. The majority of male role models are violent, ranging from historic figures to action stars and even videogame characters. It is hard to disentangle the roles of nature and nurture clearly but the end product of their combination is clear for both males and females.
In conclusion, males are more violent and women would likely be more peaceful given the opportunity to rule widely. The question of the desirability of ending all conflicts and its global impact is another matter.
Answers
are of the opinion believe
male inclination towards violence men’s tendency to hurt others
root source
international conflicts fights between countries, wars
likely true probably the case
seemingly sexist viewpoint apparently demeaning men or women
sample size example group
countless others many more
maintained continued
escalated violent conflicts increased the scale of wars
matched proportionally mirrored with the same number of
claim argue
not supported no evidence for
historical evidence unsupported by the past
major caveat factor undermining this view
exceptions outside the norm
held power were in charge
otherwise dominated by male hierarchy besides that controlled by men
powerful positions in charge
naturally predisposed genetic inclinations
aggression violent behaviour
stems from comes from/is caused by
testosterone the hormone that makes males aggressive
increase aggressive tendencies make more violent
curb this instinct slow down this tendency
potential possible
undermine their better nature at any moment work against their reasoning powers
Many a_________________n the m_________________________________e is the r______t of many i__________________________s and societies ruled by women might be more peaceful. In my opinion, this is l______________e.
The reason that some oppose this s__________________________t is based on past examples of female leaders. The s_____________e is much smaller but leaders like Margaret Thatcher, Cleopatra, Hilary Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, Queen Elisabeth I, Joan d’Arc and c___________________s have started, m_____________d, and e_________________________s. There are very few examples of peaceful female leaders and those that exist can be m__________________________________y with male leaders. The c________m that women are more peaceful is n___________________d by h____________________e. A m________________t is that these are the e________________s and women rulers have h______________r in a world o________________________________________________y. It is impossible to know how peaceful the world would be if women held the majority of p_________________________s.
Furthermore, men are n__________________________d towards a______________n. This s______________m both biology and society. Men produce more t_______________e than women and this has been shown to i______________________________s and violent behaviour. Men can c_________________________t but it has the p________________l to u____________________________________________t. There are also societal forces at work that p________n men’s p________e. From a young age, boys are raised to be tough, to n_______________n, to not c_______________e and to i______________e violent heroes. The majority of male role models are violent, r__________________m historic figures to action stars and even videogame characters. It is hard to d_____________e the roles of n___________________________e clearly but the e__________________t of their combination is clear for both males and females.
In conclusion, males are more violent and women would likely be more peaceful given the opportunity to r_____________y. The question of the d_________________y of ending all conflicts and its global impact is another matter.
Listen and check:
Listening Practice
There’s a great playlist from TedEd on this topic, starting with Cleopatra:
Reading Practice
Read the article below for more examples you can use in your writing or speaking:
This is an IELTS writing task 2 sample answer essay from the general training exam on the topic of learning practical skills at school.
These topics (schools, practical skills) are really common on IELTS and worth reading about in case if they come up on your exam!
Please consider signing up for my Patreon here in order to support my efforts and receive exclusive Ebooks and materials related to IELTS!
Dave
Before reading, listen to the audio and take notes to get the most out of it:
IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Answer Essay General Training: Practical Skills (Real Past Exam/Test)
Many feel that students today should learn practical skills at school such as car maintenance and managing a bank account.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Real Past IELTS Exam/Test
Some believe that useful life skills should be taught at schools in addition to the standard academic schedule. In my opinion, school is chiefly an opportunity to learn about academic subjects.
The main argument in favour of learning these skills is self-evident: they are useful. The majority of students graduate from high school well versed in a foreign language, algebra, anatomy, and classic literature but helpless when confronted with the realities of daily life. Some skills they lack include general car maintenance such as changing the oil or a flat tire, cooking their own meals, managing their finances, and doing odd jobs around the house. The majority of what they learned in school will not be useful in their life and, without attention, will eventually fade from memory. Practical skills, on the other hand, will stay fresh in their mind due to repeated application and have a more ostensibly tangible impact.
Nonetheless, practical skills can be learned at home while the best place to learn about academic subjects is school. Many students will learn the craft of daily life from their family or naturally pick it up later. Cooking will not become a daily habit when living at home and the skills are unlikely to resurface intact years later when called upon. In contrast, schools are filled with experts in their fields only available at this time of life. A quality math or history teacher will guide you in a way books alone cannot. The accumulated knowledge from all these experts may or may not be directly useful but this singular opportunity to learn about a wide breadth of subjects will inform an individual’s long-term intellectual life.
In conclusion, useful subjects are important but should not detract from the true purpose of schooling. Practical skills should be taught at schools only if they can be seamlessly worked into the curriculum and are not detrimental to academics.
Word Count: 308
Analysis
1. Some believe that useful life skills should be taught at schools in addition to the standard academic schedule. 2. In my opinion, school is chiefly an opportunity to learn about academic subjects.
Paraphrase the overall topic for the whole essay.
Give your opinion – don’t sit in the middle – be clear!
1. The main argument in favour of learning these skills is self-evident: they are useful. 2. The majority of students graduate from high school well versed in a foreign language, algebra, anatomy, and classic literature but helpless when confronted with the realities of daily life. 3. Some skills they lack include general car maintenance such as changing the oil or a flat tire, cooking their own meals, managing their finances, and doing odd jobs around the house. 4. The majority of what they learned in school will not be useful in their life and, without attention, will eventually fade from memory. 5. Practical skills, on the other hand, will stay fresh in their mind due to repeated application and have a more ostensibly tangible impact.
Write a topic sentence with your main idea at the end.
Begin to develop it. Notice the specific ideas and vocabulary that I use.
Be as specific as possible with your supporting ideas.
Draw conclusions from your ideas.
Here I use a counterpoint to make the argument stronger.
1. Nonetheless, practical skills can be learned at home while the best place to learn about academic subjects is school. 2. Many students will learn the craft of daily life from their family or naturally pick it up later. 3. Cooking will not become a daily habit when living at home and the skills are unlikely to resurface intact years later when called upon. 4. In contrast, schools are filled with experts in their fields only available at this time of life. 5. A quality math or history teacher will guide you in a way books alone cannot. 6. The accumulated knowledge from all these experts may or may not be directly useful but this singular opportunity to learn about a wide breadth of subjects will inform an individual’s long-term intellectual life.
Write another topic sentence with a clear main idea at the end of it.
Explain your main idea, if necessary.
Use a specific example (such as cooking) to develop your idea.
Continue to develop the same main idea.
Be as specific as possible with your support.
Draw conclusions/results to finish the paragraph.
1. In conclusion, useful subjects are important but should not detract from the true purpose of schooling. 2. Practical skills should be taught at schools only if they can be seamlessly worked into the curriculum and are not detrimental to academics.
Repeat your opinion.
Add in an extra detail or final thought to get band 7+ for task achievement from the IELTS examiner.
Vocabulary
What do the words in bold below mean?
Some believe that useful life skills should be taught at schools in addition to the standard academic schedule. In my opinion, school is chiefly an opportunity to learn about academic subjects.
The main argument in favour of learning these skills is self-evident: they are useful. The majority of students graduate from high school well versed in a foreign language, algebra, anatomy, and classic literature but helpless when confronted with the realities of daily life. Some skills they lack include general car maintenance such as changing the oil or a flat tire, cooking their own meals, managing their finances, and doing odd jobs around the house. The majority of what they learned in school will not be useful in their life and, without attention, will eventually fade from memory. Practical skills, on the other hand, will stay fresh in their mind due to repeated application and have a more ostensibly tangible impact.
Nonetheless, practical skills can be learned at home while the best place to learn about academic subjects is school. Many students will learn the craft of daily life from their family or naturally pick it up later. Cooking will not become a daily habit when living at home and the skills are unlikely to resurface intact years later when called upon. In contrast, schools are filled with experts in their fields only available at this time of life. A quality math or history teacher will guide you in a way books alone cannot. The accumulated knowledge from all these experts may or may not be directly useful but this singular opportunity to learn about a wide breadth of subjects will inform an individual’s long-term intellectual life.
In conclusion, useful subjects are important but should not detract from the true purpose of schooling. Practical skills should be taught at schools only if they can be seamlessly worked into the curriculum and are not detrimental to academics.
Answers
in addition to also
standard academic schedule normal classes/curriculum
chiefly mainly
in favour of supporting
self-evident obvious
well versed knowledgeable about
algebra a kind of math
anatomy study of the body
classic literature old books
helpless unable to do
realities of daily life day to day activities
lack don’t have
general car maintenance handy with cars
changing the oil putting new oil in your car
flat tire a tire that lost all air
managing their finances in charge of their money
odd jobs various little fix-ups around the house
majority most of
without attention neglected
eventually fade from memory be forgotten
stay fresh be remembered
due to repeated application because of being done often
ostensibly tangible impact more obvious clear effect
learn the craft of daily life learn life skills
naturally pick it up later learn it later just by living
resurface intact be remembered fully
when called upon when needed
experts in their fields know a lot about a subject
time of life point of life/age
accumulated knowledge everything they have learned added together
directly useful clear benefit
singular opportunity only chance
wide breadth diverse range
inform make up/contribute to
long-term intellectual life thinking
detract take away from
true purpose real reason
seamlessly worked into the curriculum added to their studies without it being disruptive
Some believe that useful life skills should be taught at schools i___________________o the s__________________________e. In my opinion, school is c__________y an opportunity to learn about academic subjects.
The main argument i_____________f learning these skills is s______________t: they are useful. The majority of students graduate from high school w_____________________d in a foreign language, a_________a, a____________y, and c_________________e but h___________s when confronted with the r_________________________e. Some skills they l_____k include g____________________________e such as c________________________l or a f_____________________e, cooking their own meals, m_______________________s, and doing o______________s around the house. The m_____________y of what they learned in school will not be useful in their life and, w_______________n, will e________________________________y. Practical skills, on the other hand, will s______________h in their mind d_____________________________n and have a more o_______________________________t.
Nonetheless, practical skills can be learned at home while the best place to learn about academic subjects is school. Many students will l___________________________________e from their family or n________________________________r. Cooking will not become a daily habit when living at home and the skills are unlikely to r_______________________t years later w_________________________n. In contrast, schools are filled with e________________________s only available at this t______________________e. A quality math or history teacher will guide you in a way books alone cannot. The a_____________________________e from all these experts may or may not be d___________________________l but this s______________________________y to learn about a w______________h of subjects will i______________m an individual’s l_________________________________e.
In conclusion, useful subjects are important but should not d______________t from the t______________________e of schooling. Practical skills should be taught at schools only if they can be s______________________________m and are not d_____________________l to academics.
Listen and check:
Listening Practice
Here are some basic life skills teens should learn:
Reading Practice
Here are 5 skills that you could use as examples in your writing:
This is an IELTS writing task 2 sample answer essay on the topic of learning from history from the real IELTS exam.
It is a simple question, but very hard to develop and think of examples for.
Read below to see what I did with it!
Please consider signing up for my Patreon here in order to support my efforts and receive exclusive Ebooks and materials related to IELTS!
Dave
Before reading, you can also listen to the audio file for extra practice:
IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Answer Essay: Learning from History (Real Past IELTS Exam/Test)
Some believe that history has little to teach us about today while others think that the study of the past helps us to understand the present.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Recent Past IELTS Exam/Test
Many feel that the study of the past does little to inform the present while others believe it can help aid understanding. In my opinion, history certainly holds insights but they are so deeply woven into a specific context so as to be as misleading as enlightening.
Those who argue in favour of learning from history can point to the importance of understanding a culture. A frequently cited example of this is the war between Vietnam and the United States in the mid 1960s to early 1970s. Both before and during the war, the United States President and his advisors understood little about the history of Vietnam with its successive invasions from foreign nations including China and Japan. A deeper understanding of the unity and resilience of Vietnam might have led them to make different decisions regarding splitting the country in half and the escalation of ground troops. Mistakes born of ignorance take place all the time in international relations and even domestic politics.
Regardless, history only holds lessons for the keenest observors. Every historical moment passes through a complex set of circumstances, many of which are hidden from history books, and cannot be reduced to simple lessons. For example, the Vietnam war is often summed up with the platitude that it is impossible to invade and occupy a foreign nation. This ignores the myriad reasons that led to defeat and supposes that other conflicts are identical. After the invasion of Iraq proved to be a quagmire, many relished the historical lessons of Vietnam without considering the very diverse set of circumstances that led to failure in each country. There are certainly insights to be gained from studying past conflicts, but they will rarely result in fixed, black and white rules applicable to every new situation.
In conclusion, history is not a simple road map for the future. Those who are too avid to accept seemingly apparent lessons are doomed to lead themselves astray and make new mistakes.
Analysis
1. Many feel that the study of the past does little to inform the present while others believe it can help aid understanding. 2. In my opinion, history certainly holds insights but they are so deeply woven into a specific context so as to be as misleading as enlightening.
Paraphrase what the whole essay is about.
Write a clear opinion. You don’t have to include your main ideas like I did but it will help your cohesion and coherence score.
1. Those who argue in favour of learning from history can point to the importance of understanding a culture. 2. A frequently cited example of this is the war between Vietnam and the United States in the mid 1960s to early 1970s. 3. Both before and during the war, the United States President and his advisors understood little about the history of Vietnam with its successive invasions from foreign nations including China and Japan. 4. A deeper understanding of the unity and resilience of Vietnam might have led them to make different decisions regarding splitting the country in half and the escalation of ground troops. 5. Mistakes born of ignorance take place all the time in international relations and even domestic politics.
Write a clear topic sentence with your main idea for the whole paragraph at the end.
Develop it with a specific example.
Continue using the example to develop your main idea.
Don’t switch to a new main idea or example, if possible.
Conclude by related your main idea back to the overall essay topic.
1. Regardless, history only holds lessons for the keenest observors. 2. Every historical moment passes through a complex set of circumstances, many of which are hidden from history books, and cannot be reduced to simple lessons. 3. For example, the Vietnam war is often summed up with the platitude that it is impossible to invade and occupy a foreign nation. 4. This ignores the myriad reasons that led to defeat and supposes that other conflicts are identical. 5. After the invasion of Iraq proved to be a quagmire, many relished the historical lessons of Vietnam without considering the very diverse set of circumstances that led to failure in each country. 6. There are certainly insights to be gained from studying past conflicts, but they will rarely result in fixed, black and white rules applicable to every new situation.
Another topic sentence with a clear main idea.
Explain your main idea if you need to.
Being another example.
Explain why your example proves your main idea.
Continue with the same example.
Draw conclusions from your example.
1. In conclusion, history is not a simple road map for the future. 2. Those who are too avid to accept seemingly apparent lessons are doomed to lead themselves astray and make new mistakes.
Repeat your opinion.
Add in an extra detail or final thought for full points for task achievement from the examiner.
Vocabulary
What do the words in bold below mean?
Many feel that the study of the past does little to inform the present while others believe it can help aid understanding. In my opinion, history certainly holds insights but they are so deeply woven intoa specificcontextso as to be asmisleading as enlightening.
Those who argue in favour of learning from history can point to the importance of understanding a culture. A frequently cited example of this is the war between Vietnam and the United States in the mid 1960s to early 1970s. Both before and during the war, the United States President and his advisors understood little about the history of Vietnam with its successive invasions from foreign nations including China and Japan. A deeper understanding of the unity and resilience of Vietnam might have led them to make different decisions regarding splitting the country in half and the escalation of ground troops. Mistakes born of ignorance take place all the time in international relations and even domestic politics.
Regardless, history only holds lessons for the keenest observors. Every historical moment passes through a complex set of circumstances, many of which are hidden from history books, and cannot be reduced to simple lessons. For example, the Vietnam war is often summed up with the platitude that it is impossible to invade and occupy a foreign nation. This ignores the myriad reasons that led to defeat and supposes that other conflicts are identical. After the invasion of Iraq proved to be a quagmire, many relished the historical lessons of Vietnam without considering the very diverse set of circumstances that led to failure in each country. There are certainly insights to be gained from studying past conflicts, but they will rarely result in fixed, black and white rules applicable to every new situation.
In conclusion, history is not a simple road map for the future. Those who are too avid to accept seemingly apparent lessons are doomed to lead themselves astray and make new mistakes.
Answers
does little almost no impact
inform add to/enlighten
holds insights has important information
so deeply woven intoa specificcontextso as to be asmisleading as enlightening wrapped up in the situation so much that it gives bad information
point to argue
frequently cited example of this is well-known instance
mid 1960s to early 1970s around 1965 – 1974
advisors cabinet/confidants
successive invasions attacks one after another
deeper understanding to know something very well
unity together
resilience determination
regarding splitting in connection with dividing
escalation of ground troops sending in more soldiers
mistakes born of ignorance take place errors from lack of understanding happen
international relations relationships between countries
domestic politics politics inside a country
regardless nonetheless
holds lessons has lessons/things to learn from
keenest observors sharpest interpreters
historical moment passes through event goes through
complex complicated
reduced to simple lessons easily distilled
summed up with summarised by
platitude cliche
invade attack
occupy remain in
myriad various
supposes assumes
identical the same
proved to be turned out
quagmire very difficult/tricky situation
relished took joy in
without considering not thinking of
diverse set of circumstances many factors to consider
Many feel that the study of the past d_____________________m the present while others believe it can help aid understanding. In my opinion, history certainly h________________s but they are s_______________________________________________________________________g.
Those who argue in favour of learning from history can p___________o the importance of understanding a culture. A f_____________________________________________s the war between Vietnam and the United States in the m__________________________s. Both before and during the war, the United States President and his a____________s understood little about the history of Vietnam with its s_____________________s from foreign nations including China and Japan. A d_____________________g of the u______y and r___________e of Vietnam might have led them to make different decisions r_____________________g the country in half and the e________________________________s. M____________________________________e all the time in i_____________________________________s and even d________________________s.
R________________s, history only h_____________________s for the k_________________________s. Every h_________________________________h a c_____________x set of circumstances, many of which are hidden from history books, and cannot be r_______________________________s. For example, the Vietnam war is often s________________________h the p_____________e that it is impossible to i_____________e and o_____________y a foreign nation. This ignores the m___________d reasons that led to defeat and s____________s that other conflicts are i_______________l. After the invasion of Iraq p_____________e a q________________e, many r___________d the historical lessons of Vietnam w_______________________g the very d_______________________________s that led to failure in each country. There are certainly insights to be gained from studying past conflicts, but they will rarely result in fixed, b__________________e rules a__________________e to every new situation.
In conclusion, history is not a simple r____________p for the future. Those who are too a_______d to accept s_________________________s are d____________d to l___________________________y and make new mistakes.
Listen and check:
Listening Practice
Watch my opinion of history here:
Learn an historical warning about flus here:
Reading Practice
Read an interesting article from The Atlantic on this topic here:
Talk about a person who taught you how to do something. Include:
Who it was
What they taught you
If you can still do it
Writing Practice
Write about the question below then check with my sample answer:
Some people say history is one the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like science and technology are more important than history.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
More and more students at university today are not choosing to study science.
Why is this happening?
What are the effects of this?
Real Past IELTS Exam/Test
Fewer undergraduates today than ever before are opting to pursue careers in science. This is because business related subjects offer greater financial security and this will result in less overall talent in scientific fields.
The main reason that science majors are dwindling is the lure of business. Studying a scientific subject such as biology or chemistry requires intense specification, long hours in labs, and unstable future career options. Business related majors, on the other hand, are guaranteed an easier path to a good salary and the esteem of others. Good evidence of this comes in the form of all the majors related to commerce rapidly growing in popularity including marketing, finance, corporate law, banking, and economics. Parents often put pressure on their children to major in these subjects to secure a minimum level of financial success and raise the ceiling on future earning potential.
The impact will be felt in an overall decrease of talent in science. In the past, science tended to attract the best and brightest students who saw it as a path to personal wealth, glory and the public good. A good example of this is in the decades leading up to World War 2 when advances in medicine and technology of bright individuals like Marie Curie, Alexander Fleming, and Albert Einstein made them immortal role models. Today, our role models are more likely to be businessmen of a sort such as Steve Jobs, Warren Buffet, and Donald Trump. This is not only evidence of the societal shift but also portends fewer great figures in science going forward.
In conclusion, business has siphoned off potential science majors and this will result in fewer high quality scientists. It is important to highlight the achievements of scientists and denigrate businessmen in order to curb this alarming trend.
Analysis
1. Fewer undergraduates today than ever before are opting to pursue careers in science. 2. This is because business related subjects offer greater financial security and this will result in less overall talent in scientific fields.
Paraphrase the overall topic for the essay first of all.
Write a clear opinion.
1. The main reason that science majors are dwindling is the lure of business. 2. Studying a scientific subject such as biology or chemistry requires intense specification, long hours in labs, and unstable future career options. 3. Business related majors, on the other hand, are guaranteed an easier path to a good salary and the esteem of others. 4. Good evidence of this comes in the form of all the majors related to commerce rapidly growing in popularity including marketing, finance, corporate law, banking, and economics. 5. Parents often put pressure on their children to major in these subjects to secure a minimum level of financial success and raise the ceiling on future earning potential.
Write a topic sentence with a main idea at the end. Keep this sentence short and simply.
Begin to develop your main idea. Here I start with a counter-example.
Then I transition to why business is so appealing.
I develop the appeal of business.
Finally, I add another detail to support my main idea – not a new main idea!
1. The impact will be felt in an overall decrease of talent in science. 2. In the past, science tended to attract the best and brightest students who saw it as a path to personal wealth, glory and the public good. 3. A good example of this is in the decades leading up to World War 2 when advances in medicine and technology of bright individuals like Marie Curie, Alexander Fleming, and Albert Einstein made them immortal role models. 4. Today, our role models are more likely to be businessmen of a sort such as Steve Jobs, Warren Buffet, and Donald Trump. 5. This is not only evidence of the societal shift but also portends fewer great figures in science going forward.
Write another topic sentence with a main idea for the other side.
Explain your main idea, if necessary.
Use specific examples as I do here.
Develop those examples.
Conclude your paragraph by relating it back to the main topic.
1. In conclusion, business has siphoned off potential science majors and this will result in fewer high quality scientists. 2. It is important to highlight the achievements of scientists and denigrate businessmen in order to curb this alarming trend.
Repeat your opinion.
Add in a final detail/thought for full marks from the IELTS examiner.
Vocabulary
What do the words in bold below mean?
Fewer undergraduates today than ever before are opting to pursue careers in science. This is because business related subjects offer greater financial security and this will result in less overall talent in scientific fields.
The main reason that science majors are dwindling is the lure of business. Studying a scientific subject such as biology or chemistry requires intense specification, long hours in labs, and unstable future career options. Business related majors, on the other hand, are guaranteed an easier path to a good salary and the esteem of others. Good evidence of this comes in the form of all the majors related to commerce rapidly growing in popularity including marketing, finance, corporate law, banking, and economics. Parents often put pressure on their children to major in these subjects to secure a minimum level of financial success and raise the ceiling on future earning potential.
The impact will be felt in an overall decrease of talent in science. In the past, science tended to attract the best and brightest students who saw it as a path to personal wealth, glory and the public good. A good example of this is in the decades leading up to World War 2 when advances in medicine and technology of bright individuals like Marie Curie, Alexander Fleming, and Albert Einstein made them immortal role models. Today, our role models are more likely to be businessmen of a sort such as Steve Jobs, Warren Buffet, and Donald Trump. This is not only evidence of the societal shift but also portends fewer great figures in science going forward.
In conclusion, business has siphoned off potential science majors and this will result in fewer high quality scientists. It is important to highlight the achievements of scientists and denigrate businessmen in order to curb this alarming trend.
Answers
than ever before greater compared to
opting choosing
pursue careers major in/study
offer greater financial security more stable career
result in end up with
dwindling decreasing
lure attraction/appeal
specification becoming focused on one area, opposite of a generalist
labs where scientists work (laboratories)
unstable future career options uncertain job prospects
guaranteed will definitely get
easier path fewer obstacles/challenges
esteem opinion
good evidence strong support
commerce related to buying/selling/trading
marketing advertisting
finance related to money
corporate law becoming a lawyer specialising in companies
put pressure on force
major verb of major (choose to study)
secure a minimum level of financial success guarantee a decent paycheck
raise the ceiling on future earning potential allow for the possibility of big salaries
Remember and fill in the blanks in your head or on a piece of paper:
Fewer undergraduates today t___________________e are o________g to p_________________s in science. This is because business related subjects o_________________________________y and this will r_____________n less overall talent in scientific fields.
The main reason that science majors are d_____________g is the l______e of business. Studying a scientific subject such as biology or chemistry requires intense s______________n, long hours in l____s, and u______________________________s. Business related majors, on the other hand, are g___________d an e________h to a good salary and the e________m of others. G_______________e of this comes in the form of all the majors related to c_____________e rapidly growing in popularity including m___________g, f_____________e, c__________________w, banking, and economics. Parents often p________________n their children to m_____r in these subjects to s________________________________________________s and r_______________________________________________l.
The i_____________________________t in an overall decrease of talent in science. In the past, science t__________________o attract the b____________________________t students who saw it as a p___________________________________h, g___________y and t___________________d. A good example of this is in the decades l_________________o World War 2 when advances in medicine and technology of b______________________s like Marie Curie, Alexander Fleming, and Albert Einstein made them i________________________s. Today, our role models are more likely to be businessmen o_____________t such as Steve Jobs, Warren Buffet, and Donald Trump. This is not only evidence of the s_______________t but also p________________s fewer great figures in science g_______________d.
In conclusion, business has s_________________f potential science majors and this will result in fewer high quality scientists. It is important to h______________t the achievements of scientists and d______________e businessmen in order to c_______b this a_____________________d.
Listen and check:
Listening Practice
Listen to a well-known scientist on this topic and get some ideas:
Answer the following question below then read my sample answer:
Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and then give your own opinion.
"The highest quality materials anywhere on the internet! Dave improved my writing and vocabulary so much. Really affordable options you don't want to miss out on!"