IELTS Essay: Wild Animals in Urban Areas
Many wild birds and animals live in towns and cities. Some people think that the wildlife should be protected. Some think that they should be removed.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some believe that wild animals should not be allowed to live in urban areas. In my opinion, although these animals pose a threat to health and safety, they should remain as they contribute to the character of a city.
Those in favor of eliminating certain animal species argue they can be dangerous. It is common, for instance in various locales in New England, for deer to cause traffic accidents. However, the chances that a motorist is actually injured are extremely low. The more pressing threat relates to the species that often serve as carriers for infectious diseases. Rats are the best examples as they are prevalent in most cities and often transmit diseases. The most infamous instance being an outbreak of bubonic plague caused by rodents termed the Black Death that ravaged Europe in the 1300s.
Nonetheless, the examples above are exceptions and wild animals generally add to the identity of a city or town. There are cities in Asia where locals live in relative harmony with species of monkeys and wild birds. One of the more noteworthy examples of this would be Singapore. In Singapore, it is not uncommon to see rare species of monkeys, tropical birds and wild pigs. These animals are not only cherished by local residents but also serve as an attraction for tourists. The city has managed to control population numbers so that they do not become a nuisance while also allowing them to constitute a key element of the city’s unique charm.
In conclusion, despite potential for the spread of disease and a lack of general safety, the contributions of wild animals to the personality of a city justify their continued existence. Individuals will always have the option to move to areas where there is less wildlife if they are concerned.
Analysis
1. Some believe that wild animals should not be allowed to live in urban areas. 2. In my opinion, although these animals pose a threat to health and safety, they should remain as they contribute to the character of a city.
1. Those in favor of eliminating certain animal species argue they can be dangerous. 2. It is common, for instance in various locales in New England, for deer to cause traffic accidents. 3. However, the chances that a motorist is actually injured are extremely low. 4. The more pressing threat relates to the species that often serve as carriers for infectious diseases. 5. Rats are the best examples as they are prevalent in most cities and often transmit diseases. 6. The most infamous instance being an outbreak of bubonic plague caused by rodents termed the Black Death that ravaged Europe in the 1300s.
1. Nonetheless, the examples above are exceptions and wild animals generally add to the identity of a city or town. 2. There are cities in Asia where locals live in relative harmony with species of monkeys and wild birds. 3. One of the more noteworthy examples of this would be Singapore. 4. In Singapore, it is not uncommon to see rare species of monkeys, tropical birds and wild pigs. 5. These animals are not only cherished by local residents but also serve as an attraction for tourists. 6. The city has managed to control population numbers so that they do not become a nuisance while also allowing them to constitute a key element of the city’s unique charm.
1. In conclusion, despite potential for the spread of disease and a lack of general safety, the contributions of wild animals to the personality of a city justify their continued existence. 2. Individuals will always have the option to move to areas where there is less wildlife if they are concerned.
Vocabulary
Some believe that wild animals should not be allowed to live in urban areas. In my opinion, although these animals pose a threat to health and safety, they should remain as they contribute to the character of a city.
Those in favor of eliminating certain animal species argue they can be dangerous. It is common, for instance in various locales in New England, for deer to cause traffic accidents. However, the chances that a motorist is actually injured are extremely low. The more pressing threat relates to the species that often serve as carriers for infectious diseases. Rats are the best examples as they are prevalent in most cities and often transmit diseases. The most infamous instance being an outbreak of bubonic plague caused by rodents termed the Black Death that ravaged Europe in the 1300s.
Nonetheless, the examples above are exceptions and wild animals generally add to the identity of a city or town. There are cities in Asia where locals live in relative harmony with species of monkeys and wild birds. One of the more noteworthy examples of this would be Singapore. In Singapore, it is not uncommon to see rare species of monkeys, tropical birds and wild pigs. These animals are not only cherished by local residents but also serve as an attraction for tourists. The city has managed to control population numbers so that they do not become a nuisance while also allowing them to constitute a key element of the city’s unique charm.
In conclusion, despite potential for the spread of disease and a lack of general safety, the contributions of wild animals to the personality of a city justify their continued existence. Individuals will always have the option to move to areas where there is less wildlife if they are concerned.
Answers
allowed permitted
urban areas cities
pose a threat create problems
health and safety people feeling safe and not in danger
remain stay
contribute add to
character personality
those in favor of supporters of
eliminating destroying
species argue different types of animals claim
dangerous threatening
common happens a lot
various locales different places
cause traffic accidents cars hitting things
however but
motorist person driving
injured hurt
extremely low not much chance
pressing threat urgent problem
relates to concerning
serve as carriers for transport the disease
infectious diseases easily spread conditions
prevalent common
transmit diseases spread illness
infamous instance being notorious example was
outbreak occurrence of
bubonic plague a really infectious disease
caused by a result of
rodents rats and similar animals
termed the Black Death this was the name of the illness
ravaged destroyed by
1300s 1300 – 1400
nonetheless regardless
exceptions outliers
generally overall
identity personality
locals people living there
relative harmony comparable balance
One of the more noteworthy examples of this would be a good instance of this is
not uncommon common
rare species not common types of animals
tropical birds rare birds from hot climates
cherished by cared a lot by
serve as an attraction be an important sight
tourists visitors
managed were able to
control population numbers keep the number of animals low
nuisance annoyance
constitute make up
key element crucial part
unique charm individual appeal
despite potential regardless of the possible
spread send out
lack don’t have
continued existence stay alive
concerned had to do with
Pronunciation
Vocabulary Practice
Some believe that wild animals should not be a__________d to live in u______________s. In my opinion, although these animals p_________________t to h____________________y, they should r__________n as they c_____________e to the c__________r of a city.
T___________________f e______________g certain animal s______________e they can be d_____________s. It is c__________n, for instance in v__________________s in New England, for deer to c__________________________s. H___________r, the chances that a m____________t is actually i_________d are e________________w. The more p___________________t r______________o the species that often s____________s c_____________r i____________________s. Rats are the best examples as they are p____________t in most cities and often t__________________s. The most i__________________________g an o__________k of b________________e c_____________y r________s t__________d t_________________h that r____________d Europe in the 1_________s.
N_______________s, the examples above are e_____________s and wild animals g____________y add to the i___________y of a city or town. There are cities in Asia where l_______s live in r________________y with species of monkeys and wild birds. O___________________________________e Singapore. In Singapore, it is n________________n to see r________________s of monkeys, t___________________s and wild pigs. These animals are not only c_______________y local residents but also s__________________________________n for t________________s. The city has m___________d to c________________________________s so that they do not become a n_____________e while also allowing them to c______________e a k___________________t of the city’s u_________________m.
In conclusion, d___________________l for the s_______d of disease and a l____k of general safety, the contributions of wild animals to the personality of a city justify their c_____________________e. Individuals will always have the option to move to areas where there is less wildlife if they are c_____________d.
Listening Practice
Reading Practice
https://www.ranker.com/list/animals-that-live-in-cities/jonathan-sherman
Speaking Practice
Animals
- What was your favorite animal as a child?
- Do people in your country keep pets?
- What kind of pet would you not like to have?
- Is environmental protection important?
Writing Practice
Some people believe that wild animals should not be kept in zoos or other man-made environments as there is no longer a need for them in the 21st century.
Do you agree or disagree?
0 Comments