This is an IELTS writing task 2 sample answer essay on the topic of public art.
Sign up for my Patreon here so that you don’t miss any question PDFs.
Dave
IELTS Essay: Public Art
Some people believe that the government should spend more money putting in more works of art like paintings and statues in cities to make them better places to live in.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some feel governments should invest more in public art in cities to boost the quality of life. Personally, I am in disagreement with this idea because it has little actual importance for the average citizen.
On the one hand, public art beautifies a city. A city stripped of all art gives off the dreary appearance of being purely for utilitarian value and the daily rigour of work. In contrast, cities that have invested heavily in public art, such as New York City, offer their residents a beautiful and inspiring home. A child who sees sculptures and murals walking home will feel the city is a nicer place to live and workers passing by works of art will have some emotional relief from the demands of the day. This not only builds up the character of urban areas for local inhabitants and instills a sense of pride, but also attracts tourists and professional artists to the city, both of which contribute to a vibrant city.
Nonetheless, public art has little quantifiable positive value. Most city-dwellers are too engrossed in their hectic schedules to notice public art. This art, therefore, means nothing to most locals, while also diverting an outsized share of a city’s budget. There are other more vital areas requiring development such as high-end infrastructure, well-rounded healthcare systems, and modern recreational facilities. Moreover, the public space used to house these works of art cannot be used for practical purposes including critical public facilities like restrooms, bus stops or parks. Those who rely on these other facilities will have more trouble finding them and their quality of life may be somewhat impacted by a preference for art.
Despite the aesthetic value of public art, government bodies should focus more on urban issues that truly matter to their constituents. There must be a degree of balance but it should always tip more towards pragmatic concerns.
Analysis
1. Some feel governments should invest more in public art in cities to boost the quality of life. 2. Personally, I am in disagreement with this idea because it has little actual importance for the average citizen.
- Paraphrase the overall essay topic.
- Choose a clear side. Read more about introductions here.
1. On the one hand, public art beautifies a city. 2. A city stripped of all art gives off the dreary appearance of being purely for utilitarian value and the daily rigour of work. 3. In contrast, cities that have invested heavily in public art, such as New York City, offer their residents a beautiful and inspiring home. 4. A child who sees sculptures and murals walking home will feel the city is a nicer place to live and workers passing by works of art will have some emotional relief from the demands of the day. 5. This not only builds up the character of urban areas for local inhabitants and instills a sense of pride, but also attracts tourists and professional artists to the city, both of which contribute to a vibrant city.
- Write a topic sentence with a clear main idea at the end.
- Explain your main idea.
- Give a specific example.
- Develop the example.
- Finish developing the example fully.
1. Nonetheless, public art has little quantifiable positive value. 2. Most city-dwellers are too engrossed in their hectic schedules to notice public art. 3. This art, therefore, means nothing to most locals, while also diverting an outsized share of a city’s budget. 4. There are other more vital areas requiring development such as high-end infrastructure, well-rounded healthcare systems, and modern recreational facilities. 5. Moreover, the public space used to house these works of art cannot be used for practical purposes including critical public facilities like restrooms, bus stops or parks. 6. Those who rely on these other facilities will have more trouble finding them and their quality of life may be somewhat impacted by a preference for art.
- Write another topic sentence with a new main idea.
- Explain your main idea.
- Continue to explain or develop the idea.
- Give specific examples to support your idea.
- The more detail, the better!
- Conclude with a strong statement.
1. Despite the aesthetic value of public art, government bodies should focus more on urban issues that truly matter to their constituents. 2. There must be a degree of balance but it should always tip more towards pragmatic concerns.
- Summarise your main ideas and repeat your opinion.
- Add a final thought. Read more about how to write an IELTS conclusion here.
Vocabulary
What do the words in bold below mean?
Some feel governments should invest more in public art in cities to boost the quality of life. Personally, I am in disagreement with this idea because it has little actual importance for the average citizen.
On the one hand, public art beautifies a city. A city stripped of all art gives off the dreary appearance of being purely for utilitarian value and the daily rigour of work. In contrast, cities that have invested heavily in public art, such as New York City, offer their residents a beautiful and inspiring home. A child who sees sculptures and murals walking home will feel the city is a nicer place to live and workers passing by works of art will have some emotional relief from the demands of the day. This not only builds up the character of urban areas for local inhabitants and instills a sense of pride, but also attracts tourists and professional artists to the city, both of which contribute to a vibrant city.
Nonetheless, public art has little quantifiable positive value. Most city-dwellers are too engrossed in their hectic schedules to notice public art. This art, therefore, means nothing to most locals, while also diverting an outsized share of a city’s budget. There are other more vital areas requiring development such as high-end infrastructure, well-rounded healthcare systems, and modern recreational facilities. Moreover, the public space used to house these works of art cannot be used for practical purposes including critical public facilities like restrooms, bus stops or parks. Those who rely on these other facilities will have more trouble finding them and their quality of life may be somewhat impacted by a preference for art.
Despite the aesthetic value of public art, government bodies should focus more on urban issues that truly matter to their constituents. There must be a degree of balance but it should always tip more towards pragmatic concerns.
Answers
invest put money into
boost increase
quality of life standard of living
I am in disagreement with don’t agree with
little actual importance not much real impact
average citizen normal person
beautifies makes beautiful
stripped of doesn’t have
dreary appearance boring look
purely for utilitarian value only for its use
daily rigour of work daily grind of a job
invested heavily giving a lot of money to
offer their residents give to citizens
inspiring elevating
murals large paintings
passing by walking past
emotional relief makes you feel better
demands of the day rigor of work, life
builds up the character creates a sense of identity
urban areas cities
local inhabitants people who live there
instills imparts
attracts makes come there
contribute to a vibrant city makes the city better
nonetheless regardless
little quantifiable positive value not much actual import
city-dwellers city residents
engrossed lost in
hectic schedules busy days
notice pay attention to
means nothing to has no value to
diverting sending in a different direction
outsized share of a city’s budget take up too much money
vital areas important parts
high-end infrastructure roads, plumbing, electricity, etc.
well-rounded healthcare systems hospitals
modern recreational facilities gyms
moreover furthermore
house verb of house
practical purposes concrete reasons
critical public facilities key places for all residents
rely on need
somewhat impacted kind of affected
preference for art prioritising art
aesthetic value value of how it looks
government bodies governments
urban issues problems related to cities
truly matter actually important
constituents people
degree of balance some equality
tip more towards lean towards, value more
pragmatic concerns real-world issues
Pronunciation
ɪnˈvɛst
buːst
ˈkwɒlɪti ɒv laɪf
aɪ æm ɪn ˌdɪsəˈgriːmənt wɪð
ˈlɪtl ˈækʧʊəl ɪmˈpɔːtəns
ˈævərɪʤ ˈsɪtɪzn
ˈbjuːtɪfaɪz
strɪpt ɒv
ˈdrɪəri əˈpɪərəns
ˈpjʊəli fɔː ˌjuːtɪlɪˈteərɪən ˈvæljuː
ˈdeɪli ˈrɪgər ɒv wɜːk
ɪnˈvɛstɪd ˈhɛvɪli
ˈɒfə ðeə ˈrɛzɪdənts
ɪnˈspaɪərɪŋ
ˈmjʊərəlz
ˈpɑːsɪŋ baɪ
ɪˈməʊʃənl rɪˈliːf
dɪˈmɑːndz ɒv ðə deɪ
bɪldz ʌp ðə ˈkærɪktə
ˈɜːbən ˈeərɪəz
ˈləʊkəl ɪnˈhæbɪtənts
ɪnˈstɪlz
əˈtrækts
kənˈtrɪbju(ː)t tuː ə ˈvaɪbrənt ˈsɪti
ˌnʌnðəˈlɛs
ˈlɪtl ˈkwɒntɪfaɪəbl ˈpɒzətɪv ˈvæljuː
ˈsɪti-ˈdwɛləz
ɪnˈgrəʊst
ˈhɛktɪk ˈʃɛdjuːlz
ˈnəʊtɪs
miːnz ˈnʌθɪŋ tuː
daɪˈvɜːtɪŋ
ˈaʊtsaɪzd ʃeər ɒv ə ˈsɪtiz ˈbʌʤɪt
ˈvaɪtl ˈeərɪəz
haɪ-ɛnd ˈɪnfrəˌstrʌkʧə
wɛl-ˈraʊndɪd ˈhɛlθkeə ˈsɪstɪmz
ˈmɒdən ˌrɛkrɪˈeɪʃənl fəˈsɪlɪtiz
mɔːˈrəʊvə
haʊs
ˈpræktɪkəl ˈpɜːpəsɪz
ˈkrɪtɪkəl ˈpʌblɪk fəˈsɪlɪtiz
rɪˈlaɪ ɒn
ˈsʌmwɒt ɪmˈpæktɪd
ˈprɛfərəns fɔːr ɑːt
iːsˈθɛtɪk ˈvæljuː
ˈgʌvnmənt ˈbɒdiz
ˈɜːbən ˈɪʃuːz
ˈtruːli ˈmætə
kənˈstɪtjʊənts
dɪˈgriː ɒv ˈbæləns
tɪp mɔː təˈwɔːdz
prægˈmætɪk kənˈsɜːnz
Vocabulary Practice
Remember and fill in the blanks:
Some feel governments should i_______t more in public art in cities to b______t the q______________e. Personally, I______________________h this idea because it has l_________________________e for the a________________n.
On the one hand, public art b_____________s a city. A city s______________f all art gives off the d__________________e of being p_________________________e and the d______________________k. In contrast, cities that have i_____________________y in public art, such as New York City, o________________________s a beautiful and i_____________g home. A child who sees sculptures and m________s walking home will feel the city is a nicer place to live and workers p_____________by works of art will have some e____________________f from the d_____________________y. This not only b____________________________r of u_____________s for l____________________s and i_____________s a sense of pride, but also a____________s tourists and professional artists to the city, both of which c_________________________y.
N________________s, public art has l________________________________e. Most c____________________s are too e______________d in their h_________________s to n_________e public art. This art, therefore, m_________________o most locals, while also d______________g an o____________________________t. There are other more v_____________s requiring development such as h____________________________e, w____________________________s, and m______________________________s. M_____________r, the public space used to h__________e these works of art cannot be used for p______________________s including c_________________________s like restrooms, bus stops or parks. Those who r__________n these other facilities will have more trouble finding them and their quality of life may be s______________________d by a p_______________________t.
Despite the a_____________________e of public art, g_____________________s should focus more on u_______________s that t_________________r to their c_______________s. There must be a d__________________e but it should always t___________________________________s.
Listening Practice
Learn about public art in New York below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=magmyeTZ-M8&ab_channel=TheArtAssignment
Reading Practice
And check those out on this map:
https://ny.curbed.com/maps/public-art-new-york-street-art-sculpture
Speaking Practice
Practice with the following questions from the real IELTS exam:
Art
- Have you ever been to an art gallery?
- Would you like to learn more about art?
- Do you hang any art in your home?
- Do people in your country enjoy making art?
Writing Practice
Write about the following topic then check with my sample answer:
The government should lower the budget on the arts in order to allocate more money to education.
To what extent do you agree?
Very well written essay.
But BP 1. Line 4- A child who sees sculptures and murals WORKING home will feel the city is a nicer place to live and workers passing by works of art will have some emotional relief from the demands of the day.
This word WORKING does not make sense here
Thanks for spotting that, Rosy!
Dear dave
I hope every thing well with you.
Previously I thought in agree/disagree questions we should consider one side (agree or disagree, some times partially) and elaborate it (why agree or disagree) in 2 body paragraph, but I realized that you don’t go through this method and in spite of your definite opinion with being in agreement or not, consider both views and elaborate them. Finally in your conclusion you directly take one side.
it is ok?
Yes, Maryam – there is no one structure.
As long as you have a clear opinion, that is the key. Talking about both sides, depending on the question type, is also a safe bet but not always totally necessary.