Some people believe that car-free days are effective ways to reduce air pollution. However, others argue that there are other ways that are more effective.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many today feel that designated car-free days are the optimal method to reduce rising levels of air pollution. In my opinion, despite other viable options, car-free days would be the best remedy.
Critics of this policy argue that governments could instead create laws related to industrial production. Except for automobiles, the main causes of air pollution are resource mining, consumer electronics manufacturing, and textile fabrication. If governments legislated strict controls on production methods, there would be a concomitant decline in air pollution figures. For instance, in many European nations, companies have limited carbon emissions thresholds they can utilize in production and exceeding these numbers results in heavy fines and other penalties. This forward-looking solution is also appealing since it would encompass the entire calendar year, whereas car-free days are more limited in their scope.
However, car-free days would have greater impact due to their far-reaching implications. Firstly, banning cars would massively reduce air pollution figures since cars contribute more harmful gases into the atmosphere than any single industry. Secondly, banning cars would force motorists to find alternative modes of transportation that might then become habits. A person who cannot drive to work once a week, may consider working at home or utilizing public transport. If they find these options more efficient, then they may willingly abandon using their car on other days. Over time, this could begin to shift mindsets in society and individuals might become less obsessed with car ownership as a symbol of wealth and success and start prioritizing efficiency and a cleaner environment.
In conclusion, though regulation of particular industries would also aid in the reduction of air pollution, the banning of automobiles on certain days is the single best solution. Governments should consider implementing and expanding existing policies that prohibit private vehicles.
Analysis
1. Many today feel that designated car-free days are the optimal method to reduce rising levels of air pollution. 2. In my opinion, despite other viable options, car-free days would be the best remedy.
Paraphrase the overall essay topic.
Write a clear opinion. Read more about introductions here.
1. Critics of this policy argue that governments could instead create laws related to industrial production. 2. Except for automobiles, the main causes of air pollution are resource mining, consumer electronics manufacturing, and textile fabrication. 3. If governments legislated strict controls on production methods, there would be a concomitant decline in air pollution figures. 4. For instance, in many European nations, companies have limited carbon emissions thresholds they can utilize in production and exceeding these numbers results in heavy fines and other penalties. 5. This forward-looking solution is also appealing since it would encompass the entire calendar year, whereas car-free days are more limited in their scope.
Write a topic sentence with a clear main idea at the end.
Explain your main idea.
Develop it with specific or hypothetical examples.
Keep developing it fully.
You can sometimes include the counterpoint here too.
1. However, car-free days would have greater impact due to their far-reaching implications. 2. Firstly, banning cars would massively reduce air pollution figures since cars contribute more harmful gases into the atmosphere than any single industry. 3. Secondly, banning cars would force motorists to find alternative modes of transportation that might then become habits. 4. A person who cannot drive to work once a week, may consider working at home or utilizing public transport. 5. If they find these options more efficient, then they may willingly abandon using their car on other days. 6. Over time, this could begin to shift mindsets in society and individuals might become less obsessed with car ownership as a symbol of wealth and success and start prioritizing efficiency and a cleaner environment.
Write a new topic sentence with a new main idea at the end.
Explain your new main idea.
Include specific details and examples.
Add as much information as you can and make sure it links logically.
Continue your development.
Use a variety of grammar.
1. In conclusion, though regulation of particular industries would also aid in the reduction of air pollution, the banning of automobiles on certain days is the single best solution. 2. Governments should consider implementing and expanding existing policies that prohibit private vehicles.
Summarise your main ideas.
Include a final thought. Read more about conclusions here.
Vocabulary
What do the words in bold below mean?Make some notes on paper to aid memory and then check below.
Many today feel that designated car-free days are the optimal method to reduce rising levels of air pollution. In my opinion, despite other viable options, car-free days would be the best remedy.
Critics of this policy argue that governments could instead create laws related to industrial production. Except for automobiles, the main causes of air pollution are resource mining, consumer electronics manufacturing, and textile fabrication. If governments legislated strict controls on production methods, there would be a concomitant decline in air pollution figures. For instance, in many European nations, companies have limited carbon emissionsthresholds they can utilize in production and exceeding these numbers results in heavy fines and other penalties. This forward-looking solution is also appealing since it would encompass the entire calendar year, whereas car-free days are more limited in their scope.
However, car-free days would have greater impact due to their far-reaching implications. Firstly, banning cars would massively reduce air pollution figures since cars contribute more harmful gases into the atmosphere than any single industry. Secondly, banning cars would force motorists to find alternative modes of transportation that might then become habits. A person who cannot drive to work once a week, may consider working at home or utilizing public transport. If they find these options more efficient, then they may willingly abandon using their car on other days. Over time, this could begin to shift mindsets in society and individuals might become less obsessed with car ownership as a symbol of wealth and success and start prioritizing efficiency and a cleaner environment.
In conclusion, though regulation of particular industries would also aid in the reduction of air pollution, the banning of automobiles on certain days is the single best solution. Governments should consider implementing and expanding existing policies that prohibit private vehicles.
Answers
For extra practice, write an antonym (opposite word) on a piece of paper to help you remember the new vocabulary:
designated car-free days days when you are not allowed to drive your car
optimal method to reduce rising levels of air pollution best way to cut down on lack of fresh air
despite other viable options regardless of other good choices
remedy solution
Critics of this policy argue people who are against this idea
instead create laws related to industrial production better to limit pollution from companies
Except for automobiles with the exception of cars
main causes primary sources
resource mining getting materials like coal out of the Earth
consumer electronics manufacturing making products like iPhones
textile fabrication making clothing
legislated strict controls on production methods make laws to regulate manufacturing
concomitant decline in air pollution figures related fall in numbers for unclean air
limited carbon emissionsthresholds only a certain amount you can add to the air
exceeding these numbers results in heavy fines and other penalties going above these figures means you have to pay or receive other punishments
This forward-looking solution is also appealing since the long-term fix is good because
encompass include
entire calendar year whole year
whereas instead of
limited in their scope doesn’t encompass everything
greater impact due to their far-reaching implications more effect because of repercussions
massively reduce air pollution hugely cut down on unclean air
harmful gases into the atmosphere than any single industry air pollution caused by one field
force motorists make drivers
alternative modes of transportation different ways of getting around
habits what you do every day
may consider working at home or utilizing public transport might work remotely or take buses, the metro, etc.
efficient doesn’t waste time or energy
willingly abandon of their own choice stop using
Over time in the long-term
begin to shift mindsets in society start to change how people think and act
individuals might become less obsessed with car ownership as a symbol of wealth and success people might not care as much about how cars boost their self-esteem
start prioritizing efficiency and a cleaner environment care more about saving time and energy and being good for nature
aid in help
on certain days on particular days
consider implementing and expanding existing policies that prohibit private vehicles think about putting in place laws to ban cars
I recommend getting a pencil and piece of paper because that aids memory. Then write down the missing vocabulary from my sample answer in your notebook:
Many today feel that d_______________________________s are the o____________________________________________________s o_______________________n. In my opinion, d____________________________s, car-free days would be the best r________y.
C___________________e that governments could i__________________________________n. E_________________________s, the m________________s of air pollution are r_____________g, c_____________________________________g, and t________________n. If governments l___________________________________________s, there would be a c________________________________________________s. For instance, in many European nations, companies have l________________________________________s they can utilize in production and e_______________________________________________________________s. T_______________________________________________e it would e____________s the e________________r, w___________s car-free days are more l_________________e.
However, car-free days would have g_________________________________________s. Firstly, banning cars would m________________________________n figures since cars contribute more h_________________________________________________________y. Secondly, banning cars would f_________________s to find a____________________________________________n that might then become h_______s. A person who cannot drive to work once a week, m_____________________________________________________t. If they find these options more e_________t, then they may w___________________n using their car on other days. O_________e, this could b__________________________________y and i___________________________________________________________________________s and s__________________________________________________t.
In conclusion, though regulation of particular industries would also a_____n the reduction of air pollution, the banning of automobiles o_____________________s is the single best solution. Governments should c___________________________________________________________________s.
Listening Practice
Learn more about this topic by watching from YouTube below and practice with these activities:
The line chart details fuel consumption from 1980 to 2030 in the United States. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that petrol and oil have been and will continue to be the dominant fuel sources, followed by coal and natural gas, and more distantly by renewable energies. All varieties of fuel have increased and are expected to continue rising with the exception of hydropower which will remain stable overall.
Petrol and oil consumption stood at 35 quadrillion units in 1980 before a slight dip with minor fluctuations around 33 million quadrillion units until approximately 2000. From that point on, a steadier rise begins that is anticipated to reach nearly 50 quadrillion by 2030, by far the greatest data point in the chart. Coal and natural gas were considerably lower and displayed broadly similar trends. Natural gas began the period at 20 quadrillion units and coal was 4 quadrillion lower. Over the following years, the figures were erratic and their relative positions in the chart switched several times until coal began to separate itself around 2015, predicted to finish around 8 quadrillion units higher than natural gas at 30 quadrillion.
The consumption of cleaner energy sources was less significant with nuclear the highest, rising to just over 6 quadrillion by the end of the projections. Solar and wind power are slightly lower at near 5 quadrillion and hydropower underwent minor fluctuations to finish around 4 quadrillion units.
Analysis
1. The line chart details fuel consumption from 1980 to 2030 in the United States. 2. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that petrol and oil have been and will continue to be the dominant fuel sources, followed by coal and natural gas, and more distantly by renewable energies. 3. All varieties of fuel have increased and are expected to continue rising with the exception of hydropower which will remain stable overall.
Paraphrase what the bar chart shows.
Write a clear overview summarising the differences.
This one is a little complex so it needs a second sentence for the overview.
1. Petrol and oil consumption stood at 35 quadrillion units in 1980 before a slight dip with minor fluctuations around 33 million quadrillion units until approximately 2000. 2. From that point on, a steadier rise begins that is anticipated to reach nearly 50 quadrillion by 2030, by far the greatest data point in the chart. Coal and natural gas were considerably lower and displayed broadly similar trends. 3. Natural gas began the period at 20 quadrillion units and coal was 4 quadrillion lower. 4. Over the following years, the figures were erratic and their relative positions in the chart switched several times until coal began to separate itself around 2015, predicted to finish around 8 quadrillion units higher than natural gas at 30 quadrillion.
Begin writing about the data for the first categories.
Make sure you compare as much as possible.
Keep using the units too.
There is a lot of data so this essay is a little longer than normal.
1. The consumption of cleaner energy sources was less significant with nuclear the highest, rising to just over 6 quadrillion by the end of the projections. 2. Solar and wind power are slightly lower at near 5 quadrillion and hydropower underwent minor fluctuations to finish around 4 quadrillion units.
Write about the final other parts of the graph – include everything!
Compare the categories.
Vocabulary
What do the words in bold below mean?Make some notes on paper to aid memory and then check below.
The line chart details fuelconsumption from 1980 to 2030 in the United States. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that petrol and oil have been and will continue to be the dominant fuel sources, followed bycoal and natural gas, and more distantly by renewable energies. All varieties of fuel have increased and are expected to continue rising with the exception ofhydropower which will remain stable overall.
Petrol and oil consumption stood at 35 quadrillion units in 1980 before a slight dip with minor fluctuations around 33 million quadrillion units until approximately 2000. From that point on, a steadier rise begins that is anticipated toreach nearly 50 quadrillion by 2030, by far the greatest data point in the chart. Coal and natural gas were considerably lower and displayed broadly similar trends. Natural gas began the period at 20 quadrillion units and coal was 4 quadrillion lower. Over the following years, the figures were erratic and their relative positions in the chart switched several times until coal began to separate itself around 2015, predicted to finish around 8 quadrillion units higher than natural gas at 30 quadrillion.
The consumption of cleaner energy sources was less significant with nuclear the highest, rising to just over 6 quadrillion by the end of the projections. Solar and wind power are slightly lower at near 5 quadrillion and hydropower underwent minor fluctuations to finish around 4 quadrillion units.
Answers
For extra practice, write an antonym (opposite word) on a piece of paper to help you remember the new vocabulary:
details fuelconsumption shows how much of a fuel source is used
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that petrol and oil overall fuel for cars and industry
dominant fuel sources most used kinds of energy
followed bycoal after that the black rock that comes from mining
natural gas a kind of fuel source
more distantly by renewable energies further behind by cleaner sources
varieties different kinds of
are expected to continue rising with the exception ofhydropower will keep going up but not with energy from dams
remain stable overall stay the same by the end of the period
stood at was at the level of
before a slight dip with minor fluctuations around falling down a little with erratic rises and falls near
until approximately reaching the point around
From that point on after that
steadier rise begins going up consistently starts
anticipated toreach nearly expected to get to almost
by far the greatest data point in the chart the biggest number in the whole image
considerably lower much less
displayed broadly similar trends almost the same pattern
began the period at started at
Over the following years the next years
figures data
erratic fluctuating
relative positions where they stand in comparison
switched several times changed position a few times
separate itself go off in a different direction
predicted to finish around expected to end at
cleaner energy sources not polluting kinds of energy
less significant not as important
nuclear from radioactive sources
by the end of the projections at the time the graph finishes predictions
slightly lower a little less
near almost at
underwent minor fluctuations to finish around experienced ups and downs and ended near
I recommend getting a pencil and piece of paper because that aids memory. Then write down the missing vocabulary from my sample answer in your notebook:
The line chart d______________________________n from 1980 to 2030 in the United States. L______________________________________________________________________l have been and will continue to be the d_________________________________s, f____________________l and n_______________s, and m___________________________________s. All v____________s of fuel have increased and a______________________________________________________________r which will r__________________________l.
Petrol and oil consumption s__________t 35 quadrillion units in 1980 b_________________________________________________d 33 million quadrillion units u__________________________y 2000. F_____________________n, a s_________________________s that is a______________________________y 50 quadrillion by 2030, b_______________________________________t. Coal and natural gas were c_________________________r and d__________________________s. Natural gas b____________________t 20 quadrillion units and coal was 4 quadrillion lower. O_________________________s, the f___________s were e______c and their r__________________s in the chart s_______________________s until coal began to s_________________f around 2015, p______________________________d 8 quadrillion units higher than natural gas at 30 quadrillion.
The consumption of c__________________________s was l_____________________t with n__________r the highest, rising to just over 6 quadrillion b________________________________s. Solar and wind power are s_______________ at n__________r 5 quadrillion and hydropower u_________________________________d 4 quadrillion units.
Listening Practice
Learn more about this topic by watching from YouTube below and practice with these activities:
It has been suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Some today have argued that it would be a sensible policy to teach children how to farm and raise animals at school. In my opinion, though this would require enormous resources, it would be beneficial in terms of both physical and intellectual development.
Those arguing against this proposal point out the resources needed. In order to implement such an ambitious program, schools would firstly need land nearby where animals and crops could be raised. This might be possible within a school’s pre-existing grounds, but there would still need to be significant investment in infrastructure. Schools would therefore have to reallocate a significant portion of their budget, potentially reducing the money for crucial facilities, staff, and teaching resources.
However, the advantages for the holistic development of children is overwhelming. Students today spend more time than ever before passively using technological devices. By spending more time outdoors learning about animals and crops, students will better understand their position within the natural food chain. Over time, this may lead them to adopt environmentally friendlier, compassionate lifestyle choices such as becoming vegetarians or shopping locally rather than buying from large chains. Moreover, the work outdoors would necessarily involve physical exercise. Since obesity is a growing concern in most countries, this time outside could help to improve standards of physical fitness and establish healthy lifelong habits.
In conclusion, despite the money this reform would require, schools should adopt it when possible so as to achieve a more complete education for students. Governments should consider the long-term effects when deciding on such policies.
Analysis
1. Some today have argued that it would be a sensible policy to teach children how to farm and raise animals at school. 2. In my opinion, though this would require enormous resources, it would be beneficial in terms of both physical and intellectual development.
Paraphrase the overall essay topic.
Write a clear opinion. Read more about introductions here.
1. Those arguing against this proposal point out the resources needed. 2. In order to implement such an ambitious program, schools would firstly need land nearby where animals and crops could be raised. 3. This might be possible within a school’s pre-existing grounds, but there would still need to be significant investment in infrastructure. 4. Schools would therefore have to reallocate a significant portion of their budget, potentially reducing the money for crucial facilities, staff, and teaching resources.
Write a topic sentence with a clear main idea at the end.
Explain your main idea.
Develop it with specific or hypothetical examples.
Keep developing it fully.
1. However, the advantages for the holistic development of children is overwhelming. 2. Students today spend more time than ever before passively using technological devices. 3. By spending more time outdoors learning about animals and crops, students will better understand their position within the natural food chain. 4. Over time, this may lead them to adopt environmentally friendlier, compassionate lifestyle choices such as becoming vegetarians or shopping locally rather than buying from large chains. 5. Moreover, the work outdoors would necessarily involve physical exercise. 6. Since obesity is a growing concern in most countries, this time outside could help to improve standards of physical fitness and establish healthy lifelong habits.
Write a new topic sentence with a new main idea at the end.
Explain your new main idea.
Include specific details and examples.
Add as much information as you can and make sure it links logically.
Continue your development.
Finish strong.
1. In conclusion, despite the money this reform would require, schools should adopt it when possible so as to achieve a more complete education for students. 2. Governments should consider the long-term effects when deciding on such policies.
Summarise your main ideas.
Include a final thought. Read more about conclusions here.
Vocabulary
What do the words in bold below mean?Make some notes on paper to aid memory and then check below.
Some today have argued that it would be a sensible policy to teach children how to farm and raise animals at school. In my opinion, though this would require enormous resources, it would be beneficial in terms of both physical and intellectual development.
Those arguing against this proposal point out the resources needed. In order to implement such an ambitious program, schools would firstly need land nearby where animals and crops could be raised. This might be possible within a school’s pre-existing grounds, but there would still need to be significant investment in infrastructure. Schools would therefore have to reallocate a significant portion of their budget, potentially reducing the money for crucial facilities, staff, and teaching resources.
However, the advantages for the holistic development of children is overwhelming. Students today spend more time than ever before passively using technological devices. By spending more time outdoors learning about animals and crops, students will better understand their position within the natural food chain. Over time, this may lead them to adopt environmentally friendlier, compassionate lifestyle choices such as becoming vegetarians or shopping locally rather than buying from large chains. Moreover, the work outdoors would necessarily involve physical exercise. Since obesity is a growing concern in most countries, this time outside could help to improve standards of physical fitness and establish healthy lifelong habits.
In conclusion, despite the money this reform would require, schools should adopt it when possible so as to achieve a more complete education for students. Governments should consider the long-term effects when deciding on such policies.
Answers
For extra practice, write an antonym (opposite word) on a piece of paper to help you remember the new vocabulary:
argued pointed out
sensible policy logical idea
farm and raise animals take care of livestock
require enormous resources needs a lot of money, time
beneficial in terms of both physical and intellectual development good for both the body and mind
Those arguing against this proposal point out people who are not in favor of this idea argue
In order to implement such an ambitious program to put in place this reform
firstly need land nearby first of all require the space
animals and crops could be raised livestock and vegetables/fruits to be harvested
possible can happen
school’s pre-existing grounds a school’s campus
significant investment in infrastructure lots of money for buildings, rooms, etc.
reallocate a significant portion of their budget redirect money to
potentially reducing possibly cutting down on
crucial facilities important places at a school
staff people who work there
and teaching resources things for teachers to use when teaching
advantages benefits
holistic development good for overall growth
overwhelming very strong
spend more time than ever before passively using technological devices use smartphones more often
By spending more time outdoors more time outside
understand their position within the natural food chain know how you are part of nature
Over time later on
adopt environmentally friendlier start doing better things for nature
compassionate lifestyle choices caring about the world around you
vegetarians people who don’t eat meat
shopping locally rather than buying from large chains buying from nearby farms instead of big supermarkets
necessarily involve physical exercise of course require you to be active
obesity being overweight
growing concern more and more of a worry
improve standards of physical fitness and establish healthy lifelong habits make them healthy in the long-term
despite the money this reform would require regardless of the resources needed
adopt start doing
achieve accomplish
complete education holistic learning
consider thinking about
long-term effects impact later on
deciding on such policies implementing these ideas
I recommend getting a pencil and piece of paper because that aids memory. Then write down the missing vocabulary from my sample answer in your notebook:
Some today have a________d that it would be a s____________y to teach children how to f_______________________s at school. In my opinion, though this would r_____________________________s, it would be b______________________________________________________________t.
T____________________________________t the resources needed. I__________________________________________________m, schools would f__________________________y where a__________________________________d. This might be p_______e within a s____________________________________s, but there would still need to be s_______________________________________e. Schools would therefore have to r__________________________________________t, p______________________g the money for c_________________________s, s_______f, a__________________________________s.
However, the a_____________s for the h_____________________t of children is o________________g. Students today s__________________________________________________________________s. B___________________________s learning about animals and crops, students will better u______________________________________________________n. O______e, this may lead them to a____________________________________r, c_____________________________s such as becoming v____________s or s____________________________________________s. Moreover, the work outdoors would n__________________________________e. Since o________y is a g______________n in most countries, this time outside could help to i_________________________________________________________________s.
In conclusion, d______________________________________e, schools should a________t it when possible so as to a________e a more c___________________n for students. Governments should c___________r the l_________________________s when d__________________________s.
Listening Practice
Learn more about this topic by watching from YouTube below and practice with these activities:
Here is the question – comment your answers below for some feedback!
Describe a movie that you like
You should say: When you watched it Where you watched it What it was about And explain why you like it
Here is a preview of my answer:
The movie I’d like to talk about came out the other year and took the world by storm basically – it’s called Parasite – I’m sure you’ve heard of it because…
If you want sample answer for this question, the full speaking Ebook is available on my Patreon.
"The highest quality materials anywhere on the internet! Dave improved my writing and vocabulary so much. Really affordable options you don't want to miss out on!"