The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advances in technology.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Real Past IELTS Tests
It is often argued that precipitous global declines in crime are principally down to developments in technology. While advanced technology admittedly plays an integral role in crime reduction, I would argue education hits more directly at the cause of crime.
The biggest argument in favour of technology’s impact is the advent of forensic science. In the past, forensics was an unreliable soft science that included notoriously mistake prone practices such as a dental identification and blood splatter analysis. Over the last couple of decades it has grown into a much more accurate tool. Courts now rely heavily on DNA testing, which is nearly 100% conclusive in most cases. This has had a two-fold effect, allowing prosecutors to reopen and investigate cold cases as well as better prosecute and deter current criminals.
However, education still more powerfully underpins decreases in crime because it does more to eradicate poverty. Poverty is far and away the chief cause of crime. Take for example a country such as China, which has developed rapidly in the last 30 years, elevating millions formerly below the poverty line. Their economic rise has been followed by better educational standards which has trickled down into better employment opportunities for graduates. The crime rate in China has plummeted simply because far fewer people have the basic motivation, poverty, to commit crimes.
In conclusion, the impact of technology is negligible next to educational reform, which undermines the deepest roots of crime. Forward-looking countries that prioritise education will also reap benefits that extend well beyond the crime rate.
Analysis
1. It is often argued that precipitous global declines in crime are principally down to developments in technology. 2. While advanced technology admittedly plays an integral role in crime reduction, I would argue education hits more directly at the cause of crime.
For your first sentence, paraphrase what the overall topic is.
In the second sentence, clearly state your opinion.
1. The biggest argument in favour of technology’s impact is the advent of forensic science. 2. In the past, forensics was an unreliable soft science that included notoriously mistake prone practices such as a dental identification and blood splatter analysis. 3. Over the last couple of decades it has grown into a much more accurate tool. 4. Courts now rely heavily on DNA testing, which is nearly 100% conclusive in most cases. 5. This has had a two-fold effect, allowing prosecutors to reopen and investigate cold cases as well as better prosecute and deter current criminals.
Each paragraph should begin with a clear topic sentence that says your main idea.
Give specific support. The more specific, the clearer your writing will be and the stronger your vocabulary.
Continue to develop the same main idea.
Give as much specific evidence/detail as you can to support the same main idea.
Draw a conclusion or result to finish the paragraph.
1. However, education still more powerfully underpins decreases in crime because it does more to eradicate poverty. Poverty is far and away the chief cause of crime. 2. Take for example a country such as China, which has developed rapidly in the last 30 years, elevating millions formerly below the poverty line. 3. Their economic rise has been followed by better educational standards which has trickled down into better employment opportunities for graduates. 4. The crime rate in China has plummeted simply because far fewer people have the basic motivation, poverty, to commit crimes.
Write another clear topic sentence.
Start your example right away.
Develop the same example.
The more you develop the same example, the higher your task achievement score.
1. In conclusion, the impact of technology is negligible next to educational reform, which undermines the deepest roots of crime. 2. Forward-looking countries that prioritise education will also reap benefits that extend well beyond the crime rate.
Restate your opinion – make sure it is the same as what you said in the introduction.
Add in an extra detail or final thought to get full marks for task achievement.
Vocabulary
Figure out what the words in bold below mean based on the whole sentence:
It is often argued that precipitous global declines in crime are principally down to developments in technology. While advanced technology admittedly plays an integral role in crime reduction, I would argue education hits more directly at the cause of crime.
The biggest argument in favour of technology’s impact is the advent of forensic science. In the past, forensics was an unreliable soft science that included notoriously mistake prone practices such as a dental identification and blood splatter analysis. Over the last couple of decades it has grown into a much more accurate tool. Courts now rely heavily on DNA testing, which is nearly 100% conclusive in most cases. This has had a two-fold effect, allowing prosecutors to reopen and investigate cold cases as well as better prosecute and deter current criminals.
However, education still more powerfully underpins decreases in crime because it does more to eradicate poverty. Poverty is far and away the chief cause of crime. Take for example a country such as China, which has developed rapidly in the last 30 years, elevating millions formerly below the poverty line. Their economic rise has been followed by better educational standards which has trickled down into better employment opportunities for graduates. The crime rate in China has plummeted simply because far fewer people have the basic motivation, poverty, to commit crimes.
In conclusion, the impact of technology is negligible next to educational reform, which undermines the deepest roots of crime. Forward-looking countries that prioritise education will also reap benefits that extend well beyond the crime rate.
Answers
precipitous steep/fast
declines decreases
admittedly can’t debate
integral role important part
hits more directly is at the source of
in favour of over
advent beginning
forensic science crime scene investigation
unreliable soft science hard to trust methods
notoriously mistake prone practices famously makes bad mistakes/is unreliable
dental identification identifying people by their teeth/bites
blood splatter analysis using how blood lands as evidence
It is often argued that _______________ global _______________ in crime are principally down to developments in technology. While advanced technology _______________ plays an _______________ in crime reduction, I would argue education _______________ at the cause of crime.
The biggest argument _______________ technology’s impact is the _______________ of _______________. In the past, forensics was an _______________ that included _______________ such as a _______________ and _______________. Over the last couple of decades it has grown into a much more accurate tool. Courts now _______________ on _______________, which is nearly _______________ in most cases. This has had a _______________, allowing _______________ to _______________ and investigate _______________ as well as better prosecute and _______________ current criminals.
However, education still more powerfully _______________ decreases in crime because it does more to _______________. Poverty is _______________ the chief cause of crime. Take for example a country such as China, which has developed rapidly in the last 30 years, _______________ millions formerly _______________. Their economic rise has been followed by better educational standards which has _______________ into better _______________ for graduates. The crime rate in China has _______________ simply because far fewer people have the basic motivation, poverty, to commit crimes.
In conclusion, the impact of technology is _______________ next to educational reform, which undermines the _______________ of crime. _______________ that _______________ education will also _______________ that extend _______________ the crime rate.
Listening Practice
Watch the video below to review some of the ideas from my essay and learn about how forensic science isn’t always accurate:
Reading Practice
Read the article below for an interesting, related story!
Every month I release a new answer for a difficult question on IELTS and this is the most difficult IELTS writing topic in January 2020.
Here is the question:
Many believe that individuals can do little to improve the environment. Only governments and large companies can make a real difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Real Past IELTS tests January 2020
This question may come up again on the test because on the computer based test, some of the questions get recycled over time.
Even if it doesn’t, it is still worth studying because the topic of the environment is really common on IELTS listening, reading, writing, and speaking.
In fact, almost the exact same question came up on the test in 2018 and now it has been repeated in 202!
It is also really common to see questions on the test about individual vs government/society/corporations.
Studying this answer will give you a leg up on those questions wherever they appear on IELTS!
Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Real Past IELTS Tests
Many are of the belief that museums should be free to the public because of their enormous potential to educate while others feel charging money helps ensure the quality of the art therein. I concede the benefits of the latter argument but would still side with those who advocate free admissions.
The main reason that many are in support of charging money is that it sustains both the maintenance and quality of exhibitions. A good example of this would be the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York City. MoMA is generally regarded as one of the finest museums in the world and is famous not only for its well-maintained facade but also the ever-rotating artworks on display. They charge a nominal entrance fee in the neighbourhood of $20 a ticket and invest that money wisely to ensure a memorable experience for all museum-goers.
Despite the advantages for a private museum such as MoMA, I think making all museums free would encourage more people to appreciate art. A contrasting example with MoMA would be a museum just a few blocks away: The Metropolitan Museum of Art. The MET has educated and uplifted millions of citizens regardless of their socioeconomic status. The wealthy who can afford museum admission are likely to already have a deep appreciation of the arts as well as the leisure time to enjoy their practice. People, and children especially, from poorer backgrounds have fewer opportunities and free museums is the best way to support appreciation of the arts en masse.
In conclusion, the benefits of free museum admissions, particularly for lower income families, outweigh the benefits of charging. The bigger issue is how governments and other organisations can budget free or relatively inexpensive museums.
Analysis
1. Many are of the belief that museums should be free to the public because of their enormous potential to educate while others feel charging money helps ensure the quality of the art therein. 2. I concede the benefits of the latter argument but would still side with those who advocate free admissions.
Paraphrase the main topic for your first sentence.
State your opinion clearly in the second sentence.
1. The main reason that many are in support of charging money is that it sustains both the maintenance and quality of exhibitions. 2. A good example of this would be the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York City. 3. MoMA is generally regarded as one of the finest museums in the world and is famous not only for its well-maintained facade but also the ever-rotating artworks on display. 4. They charge a nominal entrance fee in the neighbourhood of $20 a ticket and invest that money wisely to ensure a memorable experience for all museum-goers.
The first sentence of each paragraph should be a topic sentence with your main idea. My main idea here is that charing money is good for maintanence and the quality of exhibitions.
Begin developing a specific example.
Keep developing that same example – don’t switch to another example or main idea.
Finish developing the example and conclude your main idea.
1. Despite the advantages for a private museum such as MoMA, I think making all museums free would encourage more people to appreciate art. 2. A contrasting example with MoMA would be a museum just a few blocks away: The Metropolitan Museum of Art. 3. The MET has educated and uplifted millions of citizens regardless of their socioeconomic status. 4. The wealthy who can afford museum admission are likely to already have a deep appreciation of the arts as well as the leisure time to enjoy their practice. 5. People, and children especially, from poorer backgrounds have fewer opportunities and free museums is the best way to support appreciation of the arts en masse.
Another topic sentence – keep these simple and put the main idea at the end of the sentence to make your writing clear.
Begin another specific example.
Develop it.
Keep developing the example. Be as specific and detailed as possible.
Conclude the example and paragraph.
1. In conclusion, the benefits of free museum admissions, particularly for lower income families, outweigh the benefits of charging. 2. The bigger issue is how governments and other organisations can budget free or relatively inexpensive museums.
Repeat your opinion.
Add in an extra detail or final thought for full points for task achievement.
Vocabulary
Try to figure out what the words in bold mean:
Many are of the belief that museums should be free to the public because of their enormous potential to educate while others feel charging money helps ensure the quality of the art therein. I concede the benefits of the latter argument but would still side with those who advocate free admissions.
The main reason that many are in support of charging money is that it sustains both the maintenance and quality of exhibitions. A good example of this would be the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York City. MoMA is generally regarded as one of the finest museums in the world and is famous not only for its well-maintained facade but also the ever-rotating artworks on display. They charge a nominal entrance feein the neighbourhood of $20 a ticket and invest that money wisely to ensure a memorable experience for all museum-goers.
Despite the advantages for a private museum such as MoMA, I think making all museums free would encourage more people to appreciate art. A contrasting example with MoMA would be a museum just a few blocks away: The Metropolitan Museum of Art. The MET has educated and uplifted millions of citizens regardless of their socioeconomic status. The wealthy who can afford museum admission are likely to already have a deep appreciation of the arts as well as the leisure time to enjoy their practice. People, and children especially, from poorer backgrounds have fewer opportunities and free museums is the best way to support appreciation of the arts en masse.
In conclusion, the benefits of free museum admissions, particularly for lower income families, outweigh the benefits of charging. The bigger issue is how governments and other organisations can budget free or relatively inexpensive museums.
Answers
free to the public costs nothing
enormous potential lots of possibility
ensure the quality make sure it is good
therein in there
concede admit
latter last idea mentioned
side with agree with
advocate am behind
sustains supports
maintenance up keep
exhibitions art displays
MoMA Museum of Modern Art in New York City
generally regarded mostly thought of
finest museums best museums
well-maintained facade nice exterior
ever-rotating artworks on display new works of art all the time
nominal entrance fee small cost to get in
in the neighbourhood of around
invest put money into
wisely smartly
memorable experience unforgettable
museum-goers visitors to museums
private museum museum not owned by the government
appreciate art think highly of and understand art
contrasting example instance that shows the opposite
Many are of the belief that museums should be ______________ because of their ______________ to educate while others feel charging money helps ______________ of the art ______________. I ______________ the benefits of the ______________ argument but would still ______________ those who ______________ free admissions.
The main reason that many are in support of charging money is that it ______________ both the ______________ and quality of ______________. A good example of this would be the Museum of Modern Art (______________ ) in New York City. MoMA is ______________ as one of the ______________ in the world and is famous not only for its ______________ but also the______________. They charge a ____________________________ $20 a ticket and ______________ that money ______________ to ensure a ______________ for all ______________.
Despite the advantages for a ______________ such as MoMA, I think making all museums free would encourage more people to ______________. A ______________ with MoMA would be a museum just a few ______________ away: The Metropolitan Museum of Art. The MET has educated and ______________ millions of citizens ______________ their ______________. The wealthy who can afford museum admission are likely to already have a ______________ as well as the leisure time to enjoy their practice. People, and children especially, from ______________ have fewer opportunities and free museums is the best way to support appreciation of the arts ______________ .
In conclusion, the benefits of free museum admissions, particularly for ______________, outweigh the benefits of charging. The ______________ is how governments and other organisations can ______________ free or ______________ museums.
Listening Practice
Interested in going to MoMA someday?
Reading Practice
You won’t regret clicking on this link about the MET below!
IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Answer: Personal Energy Consumption (Real IELTS Test)
Scientists have been warning for many years about environmental protection and how important it is to limit our personal energy consumption.
What are the causes of the over-consumption of electricity?
How can people be encouraged to use less energy?
For decades, warnings of incoming climate catastrophe have grown louder and many today are making concerted efforts to limit their carbon footprint. In my opinion, the main cause of over-consumption of electricity is the development of technology and people can be taught to limit their energy usage through strict governmental regulations.
People today use more electricity because technology has pervaded every aspect of life. Several decades ago, electricity was mainly used to power a limited number of household items including lights, televisions and washing machines. It still powers those devices but now there are phones to charge and computers that use electricity throughout the day. People tend to spend more time at home, online with their devices thus using more power. Even the large servers and generators required to power the internet add to the collective electric toll of modern technology.
The best way to cultivate good energy habits is to impose regulations. Government regulations have been a proven remedy in curbing human excess in terms of using plastic bags (bans) and smoking (taxes). This would also work when it comes to energy. One simple solution would be to tax energy use, though this step would have socioeconomic bias built into it. A better approach might be to regulate the energy efficiency of household items. This would target a high percentage of people across all classes and have an easily quantifiable, manageable outcome.
In conclusion, outsized energy consumption is down to technology and governments can regulate to minimise it moving forward. The more effort put into reducing energy use, the more dividends future generations will reap from today’s reforms.
IELTS Sample Answer Analysis
1. For decades, warnings of incoming climate catastrophe have grown louder and many today are making concerted efforts to limit their carbon footprint. 2. In my opinion, the main cause of over-consumption of electricity is the development of technology and people can be taught to limit their energy usage through strict governmental regulations.
Paraphrase the topic of the essay for your first sentence.
Give your opinion – clearly.
1. People today use more electricity because technology has pervaded every aspect of life. 2. Several decades ago, electricity was mainly used to power a limited number of household items including lights, televisions and washing machines. 3. It still powers those devices but now there are phones to charge and computers that use electricity throughout the day. 4. People tend to spend more time at home, online with their devices thus using more power. 5. Even the large servers and generators required to power the internet add to the collective electric toll of modern technology.
Your topic sentence should clearly state your main idea for the whole paragraph.
Develop your main idea with specific detail.
Continue to develop. Don’t switch main ideas.
The more specific, the better!
Conclude your paragraph with more development or a result.
1. The best way to cultivate good energy habits is to impose regulations. 2. Government regulations have been a proven remedy in curbing human excess in terms of using plastic bags (bans) and smoking (taxes). 3. This would also work when it comes to energy. 4. One simple solution would be to tax energy use, though this step would have socioeconomic bias built into it. 5. A better approach might be to regulate the energy efficiency of household items. 6. This would target a high percentage of people across all classes and have an easily quantifiable, manageable outcome.
A new main idea for the second question.
Again, be as specific as possible developing the main idea.
Here I compare regulations in other industries to electricity.
I give my first solution here.
I conclude that there is an even better, related solution.
Conclude the paragraph again detailing why it is a good solution.
1. In conclusion, outsized energy consumption is down to technology and governments can regulate to minimise it moving forward. 2. The more effort put into reducing energy use, the more dividends future generations will reap from today’s reforms.
Repeat your opinion.
Add a final thought/extra detail at the end.
IELTS Vocabulary
For decades, warnings of incoming climate catastrophe have grown louder and many today are making concerted efforts to limit their carbon footprint. In my opinion, the main cause of over-consumption of electricity is the development of technology and people can be taught to limit their energy usage through strict governmental regulations.
People today use more electricity because technology has pervaded every aspect of life. Several decades ago, electricity was mainly used to power a limited number of household items including lights, televisions and washing machines. It still powers those devices but now there are phones to charge and computers that use electricity throughout the day. People tend to spend more time at home, online with their devices thus using more power. Even the large servers and generators required to power the internet add to the collective electric toll of modern technology.
The best way to cultivate good energy habits is to impose regulations. Government regulations have been a proven remedy in curbing human excess in terms of plastic bags (bans) and smoking (taxes). This would also work when it comes to energy. One simple solution would be to tax energy use, though this step would have socioeconomic biasbuilt into it. A better approach might be to regulate the energy efficiency of household items. This would target a high percentage of people across all classes and have an easily quantifiable, manageable outcome.
In conclusion, outsized energy consumption is down to technology and governments can regulate to minimise it moving forward. The more effort put into reducing energy use, the more dividends future generations will reap from today’s reforms.
Answers
warnings predictions
incoming climate catastrophe weather problems in the future
grown louder become more pressing
concerted efforts focused attempts
limit control
carbon footprint the amount of pollution your produce
over-consumption too much use
strict governmental regulations governments making laws to limit
pervaded throughout
aspect of life part of like
limited number not a lot
devices appliances
thus consequently
large servers computers that support the internet
generators produces electricity
collective electric toll altogether how much electricity it takes up
cultivate good energy habits make people more energy conscious
For decades, _______________ of _______________ have _______________ and many today are making _______________ to _______________ their _______________. In my opinion, the main cause of _______________ of electricity is the development of technology and people can be taught to limit their energy usage through _______________.
People today use more electricity because technology has _______________ every _______________. Several decades ago, electricity was mainly used to power a _______________ of household items including lights, televisions and washing machines. It still powers those _______________ but now there are phones to charge and computers that use electricity throughout the day. People tend to spend more time at home, online with their devices _______________ using more power. Even the _______________ and _______________ required to power the internet add to the _______________ of modern technology.
The best way to _______________ is to _______________. Government regulations have been a _______________ in _______________ in terms of plastic bags (_______________) and smoking (taxes). This would also work when it comes to energy. One simple solution would be to tax energy use, though this step would have ______________________________. A better approach might be to regulate the _______________ of household items. This would _______________ a high percentage of people _______________ and have an _______________, _______________.
In conclusion, _______________ is down to technology and governments can regulate to _______________ it moving forward. The more _______________ reducing energy use, the more _______________ future generations will _______________ from today’s _______________.
Listening Practice
Watch the video to review the sample answer above:
Student Sample Corrections
Environmentalists have
been voicing their concern for some time now[G1]. They
have pointed outpointing out that individuals should
curb their use of energy, which has been rising at an alarming rate. While the
main causes of this problem lie [G2] in
our over-reliance on technology, offering energy-efficient goods at a more
affordable price can beis a simple [G3] solution.
This IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Answer Essay deals with taxes and whether or not individuals have any additional responsibilities towards society.
I think it is a (very rare!) interesting IELTS question!
Read below for my answer, analysis, vocabulary, practice and more!
Dave
If you are able, please consider supporting my efforts (and receiving exclusive IELTS Ebooks!) by signing up for my Patreon here.
IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Answer Essay: Responsibility, Society, and Taxes (Real Past IELTS Tests)
Some people think that paying taxes is their only responsibility towards society while others feel that everyone should do more.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Real Past IELTS Tests
Many are of the opinion that taxpayers are fulfilling their obligations to society at large while other feel that responsibilty extends beyond a financial contribution to the government. In my opinion, paying taxes greatly helps fund social programs but individuals have little choice but to do more if they also want to think highly of themselves.
The main reason that many see taxes as enough are the far reaching impact of tax dollars. Take some well-run European socialist countries such as France for example. In France, there are social welfare programs underpinning their progressive society such maternity leave for new mothers, world renowned unemployment benefits, top notch schools, not to mention more basic services like police, fire, and infrastructure maintanence. These are the direct result of taxes and though their net effect varies by implementation in various countries, they are clearly the foundation of stable societies globally.
Despite the discernible impact of taxes, individuals are responsible for their daily decisions related to society. Every job will touch on, with varying degrees of strength, society. A doctor who takes his job seriously, rather than simply trying to push new drugs or unnecessary tests to drive up premiums, helps families in their most dire situations. Even a cashier has a role to play. They can do their job responsibly with a positive attitude and send out other people into society with a good impression or contribute to the rising tide of cynisism in today’s culture. These actions are unavoidable and anyone who feels the need to think of themselves as a good person has no choice but to take up a larger role in making society a better place to live.
In conclusion, thought taxes are part of what a person owes to society, they will necessarily also have a positive or negative day to day impact. People should rightly see their contributions as essentially self-interested excuses to feel good about themselves.
Analysis
1. Many are of the opinion that taxpayers are fulfilling their obligations to society at large while other feel that responsibilty extends beyond a financial contribution to the government. 2. In my opinion, paying taxes greatly helps fund social programs but individuals have little choice but to do more if they also want to think highly of themselves.
Write a simple paraphrase of the topic. Don’t waste time on this sentence.
Give your opinion – be clear!
1. The main reason that many see taxes as enough are the far reaching impact of tax dollars. 2. Take some well-run European socialist countries such as France for example. 3. In France, there are social welfare programs underpinning their progressive society such maternity leave for new mothers, world renowned unemployment benefits, top notch schools, not to mention more basic services like police, fire, and infrastructure maintanence. 4. These are the direct result of taxes and though their net effect varies by implementation in various countries, they are clearly the foundation of stable societies globally.
Your topic sentence should have the topic (taxes) and your main idea (for me it is the impact of tax dollars).
Start your example right away!
Develop that same example. Be speficic and detailed for the rest of your paragraph.
Draw a conclusion/result to your example to conclude the paragraph.
1. Despite the discernible impact of taxes, individuals are responsible for their daily decisions related to society. 2. Every job will touch on, with varying degrees of strength, society. 3. A doctor who takes his job seriously, rather than simply trying to push new drugs or unnecessary tests to drive up premiums, helps families in their most dire situations. 4. Even a cashier has a role to play. 5. They can do their job responsibly with a positive attitude and send out other people into society with a good impression or contribute to the rising tide of cynisism in today’s culture. 6. These actions are unavoidable and anyone who feels the need to think of themselves as a good person has no choice but to take up a larger role in making society a better place to live.
Write another topic sentence – this time my main idea is that people make daily decisions that related to society beyond taxes.
Explain your main idea if necessary.
Here I use a hypothetical example – always have an example.
I switch to a related hypothetical example.
Then I develop those two examples.
Conclude your paragraph.
1. In conclusion, thought taxes are part of what a person owes to society, they will necessarily also have a positive or negative day to day impact. 2. People should rightly see their contributions as essentially self-interested excuses to feel good about themselves.
Restate your opinion.
Add in an extra detail or a final thought for full points for your task achievement score.
Vocabulary
Figure out what the words in bold below mean:
Many are of the opinion that taxpayers are fulfilling their obligations to society at large while other feel that responsibilty extends beyond a financial contribution to the government. In my opinion, paying taxes greatly helps fund social programs but individuals have little choice but to do more if they also want to think highly of themselves.
The main reason that many see taxes as enough are the far reaching impact of tax dollars. Take some well-run European socialist countries such as France for example. In France, there are social welfare programs underpinning their progressive society such maternity leave for new mothers, world renowned unemployment benefits, top notch schools, not to mention more basic services like police, fire, and infrastructure maintanence. These are the direct result of taxes and though their net effectvaries by implementation in various countries, they are clearly the foundation of stable societies globally.
Despite the discernible impact of taxes, individuals are responsible for their daily decisions related to society. Every job will touch on, with varying degrees of strength, society. A doctor who takes his job seriously, rather than simply trying to push new drugs or unnecessary tests to drive up premiums, helps families in their most dire situations. Even a cashier has a role to play. They can do their job responsibly with a positive attitude and send out other people into society with a good impression or contribute to the rising tide of cynisism in today’s culture. These actions are unavoidable and anyone who feels the need to think of themselves as a good person has no choice but to take up a larger role in making society a better place to live.
In conclusion, thought taxes are part of what a person owes to society, they will necessarily also have a positive or negative day to day impact. People should rightly see their contributions as essentially self-interested excuses to feel good about themselves.
Answers
fulfilling satisfying
obligations duties
society at large all of the world
extends beyond means more than
financial contribution money given
greatly a lot
fund social programs invest in social welfare
little choice but to must
think highly love
far reaching impact large impact
well-run efficient, good
socialist large government
social welfare programs support for the poor
underpinning serving as the foundation for
progressive society liberal
maternity leave time off for mothers
world renowned unemployment benefits money when you’re not working
top notch schools great schools
not to mention also
direct result clear impact from
net effectvaries by implementation different situations
stable societies globally well-rounded countries around the world
discernible impact clear effect
touch on relates to
varying degrees of strength stronger and weaker
takes his job seriously professional
push new drugs recommend pharmaceuticals
unnecessary tests uneeded testing
drive up premiums cost more for insurance
most dire situations worst contexts
responsibly dutifully
positive attitude good outlook
a good impression likeable
rising tide becoming more common
cynisism negative attitude
unavoidable can’t get around/away from
take up a larger role become more important
owes must pay back
day to day every day
rightly correctly
self-interested excuses justifications
Vocabulary Practice
Remember and fill in the blanks:
Many are of the opinion that taxpayers are ______________ their ______________ to ______________ while other feel that responsibilty ______________ a ______________ to the government. In my opinion, paying taxes ______________ helps ______________ but individuals have ______________ do more if they also want to ______________ of themselves.
The main reason that many see taxes as enough are the ______________ of tax dollars. Take some ______________ European ______________ countries such as France for example. In France, there are ______________ their ______________ such ______________ for new mothers, ______________, ______________, ______________ more basic services like police, fire, and infrastructure maintanence. These are the ______________ of taxes and though their______________ in various countries, they are clearly the foundation of ______________.
Despite the ______________ of taxes, individuals are responsible for their daily decisions related to society. Every job will ______________, with ______________, society. A doctor who ______________, rather than simply trying to ______________ or ______________ to______________, helps families in their ______________. Even a cashier has a role to play. They can do their job ______________ with a ______________ and send out other people into society with ______________ or contribute to the ______________ of ______________ in today’s culture. These actions are ______________ and anyone who feels the need to think of themselves as a good person has no choice but to ______________ in making society a better place to live.
In conclusion, thought taxes are part of what a person ______________ to society, they will necessarily also have a positive or negative______________ impact. People should ______________ see their contributions as essentially ______________ to feel good about themselves.
"The highest quality materials anywhere on the internet! Dave improved my writing and vocabulary so much. Really affordable options you don't want to miss out on!"
